Comparison Overview
Tom Tailor

Tom Tailor
Garstedter Weg 14, Hamburg, DE, 22453
Last Update: 20/12/2025
Tom Tailor is a casual fashion and lifestyle brand. In focus: modern styles; with relaxed fits, contemporary details & a down-to-earth attitude. To us casual is not just a dress code. It’s a deeply rooted mindset. Originating in 1962 when Uwe Schröder founded our compan...

Shaw Industries
616 East Walnut Ave, Dalton, 30720, US
Last Update: 30/03/2026
Shaw Industries Group, Inc. is a leader in flooring and other surface solutions designed for residential housing, commercial spaces and outdoor environments. Leveraging strengths in design, innovation and operational excellence, the company takes a people-centered, cust...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Tom Tailor







Shaw Industries






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Textile Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tom Tailor in 2026.
Incidents vs Textile Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Shaw Industries in 2026.
Incident History - Tom Tailor (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tom Tailor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Shaw Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Shaw Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Tom Tailor

Shaw Industries
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.