Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Token Finansal TeknolojilerToken Finansal Teknolojiler
VS
Prudential FinancialPrudential Financial
Token Finansal Teknolojiler

Token Finansal Teknolojiler

Reşitpaşa Mah. Katar Cad. Öğrenci Otomasyon Sit. No: 1, İstanbul, Sarıyer, 34467, TR

Last Update: 20/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tokeninc.com
756/1000Fair

2018 yılında kurulan ve Koç Holding bünyesinde hizmet veren Token Finansal Teknolojiler, Türkiye'nin lider ödeme sistemi platform sağlayıcısı olarak fiziksel ödeme cihazları ve dijital ödeme çözümleri sunuyor. Token, sahadaki 800 binden fazla fiziksel ödeme cihazı ve ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:256
Subsidiaries:53
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Prudential Financial

Prudential Financial

Broad St, Newark, New Jersey, US, 07102

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.prudential.com
733/1000Moderate

Prudential Financial (NYSE:PRU) was founded on the belief that financial security should be within reach for everyone, and for over 140 years, we have helped our customers reach their potential and tackle life's challenges for now and future generations to come. Today, ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:27,867
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Token Finansal Teknolojiler

Token Finansal Teknolojiler

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Prudential Financial

Prudential Financial

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Token Finansal Teknolojiler in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prudential Financial in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Token Finansal Teknolojiler (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Token Finansal Teknolojiler cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Prudential Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prudential Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Token Finansal Teknolojiler

Token Finansal Teknolojiler

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Prudential Financial

Prudential Financial

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRU1010070724
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRU621072725
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRU305072625

FAQ

Between Token Finansal Teknolojiler company and Prudential Financial company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Token Finansal Teknolojiler company and Prudential Financial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Token Finansal Teknolojiler company and Prudential Financial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Token Finansal Teknolojiler company and Prudential Financial company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Token Finansal Teknolojiler company and Prudential Financial company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Token Finansal Teknolojiler company and Prudential Financial company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Token Finansal Teknolojiler company and Prudential Financial company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Token Finansal Teknolojiler company and Prudential Financial company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Token Finansal Teknolojiler company and Prudential Financial company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Token Finansal Teknolojiler company and Prudential Financial company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Token Finansal Teknolojiler company and Prudential Financial company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Token Finansal Teknolojiler and Prudential Financial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Token Finansal Teknolojiler and Prudential Financial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Token Finansal Teknolojiler or Prudential Financial ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Token Finansal Teknolojiler or Prudential Financial ?
Between Token Finansal Teknolojiler and Prudential Financial, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Token Finansal Teknolojiler and Prudential Financial, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA