Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tennessee Wesleyan UniversityTennessee Wesleyan University
VS
Georgia State UniversityGeorgia State University
Tennessee Wesleyan University

Tennessee Wesleyan University

204 East College Street, Athens, tn, US, 37303

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tnwesleyan.edu
725/1000Moderate

Tennessee Wesleyan University is a comprehensive liberal arts institution affiliated with the United Methodist Church and dedicated to helping students be more. We ensure each student receives a quality education based in the liberal arts, with dedicated faculty and sta...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:279
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Georgia State University

Georgia State University

33 Gilmer St. SE, Atlanta, GA, US, 30303

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gsu.edu
799/1000Fair

Georgia State is an urban public research university and national model for student success in Atlanta, the cultural and economic center of the Southeast. The largest university in the state and one of the largest in the nation, Georgia State provides its faculty and mo...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:12,662
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tennessee Wesleyan University

Tennessee Wesleyan University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Georgia State University

Georgia State University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tennessee Wesleyan University in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Georgia State University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tennessee Wesleyan University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tennessee Wesleyan University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Georgia State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Georgia State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tennessee Wesleyan University

Tennessee Wesleyan University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TEN21215123
Georgia State University

Georgia State University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tennessee Wesleyan University company and Georgia State University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tennessee Wesleyan University company and Georgia State University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tennessee Wesleyan University company and Georgia State University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tennessee Wesleyan University company and Georgia State University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tennessee Wesleyan University company and Georgia State University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tennessee Wesleyan University company and Georgia State University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tennessee Wesleyan University company and Georgia State University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tennessee Wesleyan University company and Georgia State University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tennessee Wesleyan University company and Georgia State University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tennessee Wesleyan University company and Georgia State University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tennessee Wesleyan University company and Georgia State University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tennessee Wesleyan University and Georgia State University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tennessee Wesleyan University and Georgia State University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tennessee Wesleyan University or Georgia State University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tennessee Wesleyan University or Georgia State University ?
Between Tennessee Wesleyan University and Georgia State University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tennessee Wesleyan University and Georgia State University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9