Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Department of Transport and Main RoadsDepartment of Transport and Main Roads
VS
State of IndianaState of Indiana
Department of Transport and Main Roads

Department of Transport and Main Roads

Phone: 13 23 80, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, AU

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tmr.qld.gov.au
775/1000Fair

We are a department of more than 8,800 employees across the state. Our vision is to create a single integrated network accessible to everyone. No department has a bigger role to play in keeping the Queensland of today moving, or in helping build for the future. Each y...

NAICS:922
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:6,202
Subsidiaries:62
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
State of Indiana

State of Indiana

200 W. Washington St., Indianapolis, 46204, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
780/1000Fair

State government is more than senators, representatives, and elected officials. We build highways, provide drivers licenses, protect our children and vulnerable populations, create jobs, connect Hoosiers to job opportunities, maintain state parks, train law enforcement...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:14,308
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Department of Transport and Main Roads

Department of Transport and Main Roads

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
State of Indiana

State of Indiana

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Department of Transport and Main Roads in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Indiana in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Department of Transport and Main Roads (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department of Transport and Main Roads cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - State of Indiana (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Indiana cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Department of Transport and Main Roads

Department of Transport and Main Roads

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
State of Indiana

State of Indiana

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Department of Transport and Main Roads company and State of Indiana company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Department of Transport and Main Roads company and State of Indiana company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Department of Transport and Main Roads company and State of Indiana company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Department of Transport and Main Roads company and State of Indiana company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Department of Transport and Main Roads company and State of Indiana company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Department of Transport and Main Roads company and State of Indiana company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Department of Transport and Main Roads company and State of Indiana company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Department of Transport and Main Roads company and State of Indiana company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Department of Transport and Main Roads company and State of Indiana company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Department of Transport and Main Roads company and State of Indiana company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Department of Transport and Main Roads company and State of Indiana company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Department of Transport and Main Roads and State of Indiana, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Department of Transport and Main Roads and State of Indiana, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Department of Transport and Main Roads or State of Indiana ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Department of Transport and Main Roads or State of Indiana ?
Between Department of Transport and Main Roads and State of Indiana, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Department of Transport and Main Roads and State of Indiana, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2