Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TL JONES by AVIRETL JONES by AVIRE
VS
FlexFlex
TL JONES by AVIRE

TL JONES by AVIRE

4th floor, G Building, 1999 -2059 Du Hui Road, Shanghai, Shanghai, 201108, CN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.avire-global.com
747/1000Moderate

From humble beginnings TL JONES by AVIRE has built a strong reputation since its establishment in 1926 making elevator history as one of the first infra-red light curtain manufacturers. Our brand was the first to release a touch COP including capacitive static touch pan...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:3
Subsidiaries:69
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Flex

Flex

12455 Research Blvd, Austin, Texas, US, 78759

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://flex.com/
799/1000Fair

Flex (Reg. No. 199002645H) is the global manufacturing partner of choice that helps leading brands design, build, and manage products that improve the world. For more information, visit flex.com. We love to hear your thoughts, comments and ideas so feel free to like, s...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:54,781
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TL JONES by AVIRE

TL JONES by AVIRE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Flex

Flex

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TL JONES by AVIRE in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flex in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TL JONES by AVIRE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TL JONES by AVIRE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Flex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TL JONES by AVIRE

TL JONES by AVIRE

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Flex

Flex

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TL JONES by AVIRE company and Flex company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TL JONES by AVIRE company and Flex company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TL JONES by AVIRE company and Flex company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TL JONES by AVIRE company and Flex company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TL JONES by AVIRE company and Flex company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TL JONES by AVIRE company and Flex company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TL JONES by AVIRE company and Flex company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TL JONES by AVIRE company and Flex company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TL JONES by AVIRE company and Flex company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TL JONES by AVIRE company and Flex company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TL JONES by AVIRE company and Flex company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TL JONES by AVIRE and Flex, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TL JONES by AVIRE and Flex, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TL JONES by AVIRE or Flex ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TL JONES by AVIRE or Flex ?
Between TL JONES by AVIRE and Flex, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TL JONES by AVIRE and Flex, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2