Comparison Overview

Slack

VS

Primary School

Slack

500 Howard St, San Francisco, California, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Slack is on a mission to make people's working lives simpler, more pleasant and more productive. It is the productivity platform for customer companies that improves performance by empowering everyone with no-code automation, making search and knowledge sharing seamless, and keeping teams connected and engaged as they move work forward together. As part of Salesforce, Slack is deeply integrated into the Salesforce Customer 360, supercharging productivity across sales, service and marketing teams. To learn more and get started with Slack for free, visit slack.com or connect with us @SlackHQ. Ensuring a diverse and inclusive workplace where we learn from each other is core to Slack’s values. We welcome people of different backgrounds, experiences, abilities and perspectives. We are an equal opportunity employer and a pleasant and supportive place to work. Come do the best work of your life here at Slack.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2,848
Subsidiaries: 48
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
4

Primary School

undefined, undefined, undefined, 2452, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-01

www.primaryschool.com.au is a directory of sites for students and lesson plans and reference material for teachers and parents. It is currently averaging up to 350,000 unique visitors a month and has over 44,000 subscribers to its free weekly newsletter which showcases the latest internet based resources. The site ranks first in results for primary school related searches in Google. It is popular because it is simple, safe and relevant.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 16,922
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tiny-spec-inc.jpeg
Slack
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/primary-school.jpeg
Primary School
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Slack
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Primary School
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

Slack has 23.46% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Primary School in 2025.

Incident History — Slack (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Slack cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Primary School (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Primary School cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tiny-spec-inc.jpeg
Slack
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Phishing, Link Manipulation, Third-Party Platform Exploitation (Wikipedia/Slack Integration)
Motivation: Malware Distribution, Credential Theft, Exploiting Trust in Authoritative Sources
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Voice Phishing (Vishing), Impersonation of IT Support/Vendors, Malicious Links
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Espionage (Potential)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Monetization, Extortion, Recruitment of Collaborators
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/primary-school.jpeg
Primary School
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Primary School company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Slack company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Slack company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Primary School company has not reported any.

In the current year, Slack company has reported more cyber incidents than Primary School company.

Slack company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Primary School company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Slack company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Primary School company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Slack company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Primary School company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Slack company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Primary School company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Slack nor Primary School holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Slack company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Primary School company.

Primary School company employs more people globally than Slack company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Slack nor Primary School holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Slack nor Primary School holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Slack nor Primary School holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Slack nor Primary School holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Slack nor Primary School holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Slack nor Primary School holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X