Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SlackSlack
VS
IndiaMART InterMESH LimitedIndiaMART InterMESH Limited
Slack

Slack

500 Howard St, San Francisco, California, US

Last Update: 04/05/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://slack.com/
683/1000Weak

Slack is on a mission to make people's working lives simpler, more pleasant and more productive. It is the productivity platform for customer companies that improves performance by empowering everyone with no-code automation, making search and knowledge sharing seamless...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:2,964
Subsidiaries:48
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3
IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

IndiaMART InterMESH Ltd., 6th floor, Tower 2, Assotech Business Cresterra, Noida, 201305, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.indiamart.com/
771/1000Fair

IndiaMART is India's largest online B2B marketplace, connecting buyers with suppliers across a wide array of industries. IndiaMART provides a platform for Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs), large enterprises, and individual buyers, helping them access diverse portfolios...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:18,682
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Slack

Slack

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

Slack has 39.02% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IndiaMART InterMESH Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Slack (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Slack cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IndiaMART InterMESH Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Slack

Slack

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WORNOTGOOZOONIKTIN1777868873
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TIN0344703102825
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GCPTINOPETHE1776717501
IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Slack company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Slack company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Slack company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Slack company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Slack company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Slack company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Slack company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Slack company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Slack company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Slack company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Slack company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Slack and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Slack and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Slack or IndiaMART InterMESH Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Slack or IndiaMART InterMESH Limited ?
Between Slack and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Slack and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2