Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TINEXTA S.P.A.TINEXTA S.P.A.
VS
GFT TechnologiesGFT Technologies
TINEXTA S.P.A.

TINEXTA S.P.A.

Piazzale Flaminio, 1b, Rome, 00196, IT

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tinexta.com
752/1000Fair

Tinexta is an industrial Group that offers innovative solutions for the digital transformation and growth of companies, professionals and institutions. Listed on the Euronext STAR Milan, it is included in the European Tech Leader index as a high-growth tech company. Bas...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:2,223
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
GFT Technologies

GFT Technologies

Schelmenwasenstr. 34, Stuttgart, 70567, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gft.com
751/1000Fair

GFT Technologies is an AI-centric global digital transformation company. We design advanced data and AI transformation solutions, modernize technology architectures and develop next-generation core systems for industry leaders in Banking, Insurance, Manufacturing and Ro...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:13,147
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TINEXTA S.P.A.

TINEXTA S.P.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GFT Technologies

GFT Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TINEXTA S.P.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GFT Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TINEXTA S.P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TINEXTA S.P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GFT Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GFT Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TINEXTA S.P.A.

TINEXTA S.P.A.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TIN4992049111725
GFT Technologies

GFT Technologies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TINEXTA S.P.A. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TINEXTA S.P.A. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TINEXTA S.P.A. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TINEXTA S.P.A. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TINEXTA S.P.A. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TINEXTA S.P.A. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TINEXTA S.P.A. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TINEXTA S.P.A. company and GFT Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TINEXTA S.P.A. company and GFT Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TINEXTA S.P.A. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TINEXTA S.P.A. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TINEXTA S.P.A. and GFT Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TINEXTA S.P.A. and GFT Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TINEXTA S.P.A. or GFT Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TINEXTA S.P.A. or GFT Technologies ?
Between TINEXTA S.P.A. and GFT Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TINEXTA S.P.A. and GFT Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57990
SUMMARY

Files or directories accessible to external parties in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57989
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57978
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-17497
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user's machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-17496
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 renders AI chat responses with markdown-it configured with html:true and injects the result into the DOM via dangerouslySetInnerHTML in chat-preview, without HTML sanitization and with CSP set to null. Attacker-controlled content that reaches the model prompt (for example a malicious skill REFERENCE.md that instructs the model to emit HTML) can cause the model response to include executable markup such as an img onerror handler. When the user views the chat response, that markup runs as JavaScript in the privileged Tauri webview, enabling arbitrary script execution in the application context (cross-site scripting).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8