Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tilray Brands, Inc.Tilray Brands, Inc.
VS
Louis Dreyfus CompanyLouis Dreyfus Company
Tilray Brands, Inc.

Tilray Brands, Inc.

Global, OO

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tilray.com
748/1000Moderate

Tilray Brands, Inc. (“Tilray”) (Nasdaq: TLRY; TSX: TLRY), is a leading global lifestyle and consumer packaged goods company with operations in Canada, the United States, Europe, Australia, and Latin America that is leading as a transformative force at the nexus of cann...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:973
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Louis Dreyfus Company

Louis Dreyfus Company

Westblaak 92, Rotterdam, South Holland, NL, 3012 KM

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.ldc.com
685/1000Weak

Louis Dreyfus Company is a leading merchant and processor of agricultural goods. We leverage our global reach and extensive asset network to serve our customers and consumers around the world, delivering the right products to the right location, at the right time – safe...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:13,663
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tilray Brands, Inc.

Tilray Brands, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Louis Dreyfus Company

Louis Dreyfus Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tilray Brands, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Louis Dreyfus Company has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Tilray Brands, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tilray Brands, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Louis Dreyfus Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Louis Dreyfus Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tilray Brands, Inc.

Tilray Brands, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Louis Dreyfus Company

Louis Dreyfus Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ADITESLOUGOO1791405129
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRA1021410090425

FAQ

Between Tilray Brands, Inc. company and Louis Dreyfus Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tilray Brands, Inc. company and Louis Dreyfus Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tilray Brands, Inc. company and Louis Dreyfus Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tilray Brands, Inc. company and Louis Dreyfus Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tilray Brands, Inc. company and Louis Dreyfus Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tilray Brands, Inc. company and Louis Dreyfus Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tilray Brands, Inc. company and Louis Dreyfus Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tilray Brands, Inc. company and Louis Dreyfus Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tilray Brands, Inc. company and Louis Dreyfus Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tilray Brands, Inc. company and Louis Dreyfus Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tilray Brands, Inc. company and Louis Dreyfus Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tilray Brands, Inc. and Louis Dreyfus Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tilray Brands, Inc. and Louis Dreyfus Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tilray Brands, Inc. or Louis Dreyfus Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tilray Brands, Inc. or Louis Dreyfus Company ?
Between Tilray Brands, Inc. and Louis Dreyfus Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tilray Brands, Inc. and Louis Dreyfus Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-22061
SUMMARY

Trident versions v25.02.1 through v26.06.1 are susceptible to a vulnerability that could allow an authenticated attacker with access to debug logs to view LUKS passphrases or SMB Active Directory credentials.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108269
SUMMARY

Remote Attestation TLS Clients provides multi-language utilities for verifying attested TLS connections. Prior to 0.5.0, the Rust and Go RA-TLS challenge verifiers accepted quote ReportData that was bound to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session before permitting application traffic. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing the clients to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in 0.5.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108268
SUMMARY

Enclave OS Virtual runs container workloads inside confidential virtual machines with end-to-end attestation. Prior to tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27, the TDX/GPU RA-TLS certificate issuer placed the certificate public-key hash and client nonce in quote ReportData but omitted a value bound to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108267
SUMMARY

Privasys Go is a maintained fork of the Go programming language that adds RA-TLS support to crypto/tls. Prior to privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5, challenge-mode RA-TLS certificates bound quote ReportData to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept a handshake terminated by the attacker as an attested enclave connection. This issue is fixed in privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-92705
SUMMARY

Aegisub is a cross-platform advanced subtitle editor. From 3.2.0 to 3.4.2, Aegisub automatically loads Automation scripts referenced by `Automation Scripts` metadata in `ASS` subtitle projects without asking whether the user trusts the scripts or their authors. An attacker can distribute a crafted `ASS` file together with a referenced malicious Automation script, and opening the `AS`  file executes arbitrary code with the privileges of the Aegisub process. From 3.4.0 to 3.4.2, inconsistent handling of embedded `NUL` characters between extension validation and filesystem operations additionally allows a crafted `ASS/Lua` polyglot to reference and execute itself as a single-file variant. The vulnerability is fixed in Aegisub 3.5.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8