Tillväxtkommissionen-malmö vs Usps - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

Comparison Overview

Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö

United States Postal Service

Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö

Lugna gatan, 4, Malmö, Skåne, SE, 25080

Last Update: 25/11/2025

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

https://malmo.se/tillvaxtkommissionen

760/1000Fair

Tillväxtkommissionen för ett inkluderande och hållbart Malmö tillsattes av kommunstyrelsen i Malmö våren 2021 med uppdrag att ta fram ett analytiskt och vetenskapligt underlag med förslag och rekommendationer för att på medellång och lång sikt förbättra förutsättningar ...

NAICS:92

NAICS Definition:Public Administration

Employees:None

Subsidiaries:0

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

United States Postal Service

475 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W., Washington, D.C., US, 20260

Last Update: 02/08/2026

View Profile

Between 650 and 699

http://www.usps.com/

672/1000Weak

As the United States Postal Service continues its evolution as a forward-thinking, fast-acting company capable of providing quality products and services for its customers, it continues to remember and celebrate its roots as the first national network of communications ...

NAICS:92

NAICS Definition:Public Administration

Employees:160,918

Subsidiaries:1

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

United States Postal Service

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

United States Postal Service has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - United States Postal Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United States Postal Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

United States Postal Service

Incidents

🔒 Incident : Breach

USP1776349784

🔒 Incident : Breach

USP853052025

🔒 Incident : Breach

USP001081724

FAQ

Between Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö company and United States Postal Service company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö company and United States Postal Service company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö company and United States Postal Service company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö company and United States Postal Service company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö company and United States Postal Service company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö company and United States Postal Service company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö company and United States Postal Service company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö company and United States Postal Service company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö company and United States Postal Service company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö company and United States Postal Service company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö company and United States Postal Service company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö and United States Postal Service, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö and United States Postal Service, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö or United States Postal Service ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö or United States Postal Service ?

Between Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö and United States Postal Service, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Tillväxtkommissionen Malmö and United States Postal Service, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94057

SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1 allows SMTP smuggling in which the received message does not match any sent message, and instead depends on crafted data sent after a rejection during DATA processing.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-19

UPDATED

Date2026-09-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.0

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

IMPACT SCORE

1.4

EXPLOITABILITY

2.2

REFERENCES

https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20260918.121220.0f87338e.en.html

CVE-2026-94056

SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, allows attackers to read certain uninitialized data from stack memory.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-19

UPDATED

Date2026-09-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

4.7

EXPLOITABILITY

2.2

REFERENCES

https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20260918.121220.0f87338e.en.html

CVE-2026-94055

SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when certain non-default TLS settings are used with GnuTLS, has a use-after-free.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-19

UPDATED

Date2026-09-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 3.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

1.4

EXPLOITABILITY

2.2

REFERENCES

https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20260918.121220.0f87338e.en.html

CVE-2026-94054

SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, has an out-of-bounds write.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-19

UPDATED

Date2026-09-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.0

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

4.7

EXPLOITABILITY

2.2

REFERENCES

https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20260918.121220.0f87338e.en.html

CVE-2026-93993

SUMMARY

Mistral Vibe before 2.25.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the worktree creation process that executes git hooks before trust validation. Attackers can supply a repository with a crafted post-checkout hook that executes arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the user running Vibe.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-19

UPDATED

Date2026-09-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CVSS4

Base Score: 8.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

5.9

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES