Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
โ† Back to TikTok company page

TikTok Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (TIKAMA1769016582)

The Rankiteo video explains how the company TikTok has been impacted by a Breach on the date June 16, 2018.

newsone

Incident Summary

Rankiteo Incident Impact
-66
Company Score Before Incident
836 / 1000
Company Score After Incident
770 / 1000
Company Link
Incident ID
TIKAMA1769016582
Type of Cyber Incident
Breach
Primary Vector
NA
Data Exposed
European usersโ€™ data stored on Chinese servers
First Detected by Rankiteo
June 16, 2018
Last Updated Score
March 14, 2026

If the player does not load, you can open the video directly.

newsone

Key Highlights From This Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of TikTok's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteoโ€™s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts TikTok Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteoโ€™s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
newsone

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the TikTok breach identified under incident ID TIKAMA1769016582.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of TikTok's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tiktok, the number of followers: 3962322, the industry type: Entertainment Providers and the number of employees: 81193 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 836 and after the incident was 770 with a difference of -66 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on TikTok and their customers.

TikTok recently reported "TikTok GDPR Violation for Data Transfers to China", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

TikTok was fined โ‚ฌ530 million by Ireland's Data Protection Commission for storing European usersโ€™ data on Chinese servers between July 2020 and November 2022 without adequate safeguards or transparency.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing European usersโ€™ data stored on Chinese servers, plus an estimated financial loss of โ‚ฌ530 million fine.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Completed (fine upheld), teams are taking away lessons such as Need for stricter safeguards in international data transfers, especially to non-U.S. countries, and recommending next steps like Implement robust data protection measures for cross-border data flows, ensure transparency in data storage practices, and comply with GDPR requirements for international transfers.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating storing European usersโ€™ data on Chinese servers without adequate safeguards. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating european usersโ€™ data stored on Chinese servers between July 2020 and November 2022. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating without adequate safeguards or transparency in data storage practices and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating trusted relationship exploited for data transfers to Chinese servers. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement: External Defacement (T1491.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating brand reputation impact such as High and Financial Theft (T1657) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating โ‚ฌ530 million fine imposed for GDPR violation. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.