Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tigo ColombiaTigo Colombia
VS
Reliance CommunicationsReliance Communications
Tigo Colombia

Tigo Colombia

Medellín, Bogotá, Cali, Barranquilla, Cartagena, Pereira, Manizales, Bucaramanga, Palmira, Valledupar, Villavicencio, Santa Marta, Montería, Tuluá, Tolú, Sincelejo, Cúcuta, Barrancabermeja, Armenia, Boyacá, Ibagué, Huila y Caquetá., Colombia 050022, CO, Medellín, Bogotá, Cali, Barranquilla, Cartagena, Pereira, Manizales, Bucaramanga, Palmira, Valledupar, Villavicencio, Santa Marta, Montería, Tuluá, Tolú, Sincelejo, Cúcuta, Barrancabermeja, Armenia, Boyacá, Ibagué, Huila y Caquetá., Colombia 050022, CO

Last Update: 25/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tigo.co
766/1000Fair

Tigo is one of the most relevant telecommunications service operators in Colombia, whose main purpose is to connect more and more Colombians through digital highways in fixed and mobile networks and a differential value offer, promoting innovation as a DNA for the organ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Reliance Communications

Reliance Communications

A Block, 2nd Floor, Reliance Communications Limited, DAKC, Kopar Khairane, Navi Mumbai, 400710, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.rcom.co.in
749/1000Moderate

Reliance Communications Limited, founded by the late Shri Dhirubhai H Ambani (1932-2002), has Corporate clientele that includes 40,000 Indian and multinational corporations, including small and medium enterprises. Reliance Communications has established a pan-India, Ne...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:18,259
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tigo Colombia

Tigo Colombia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Reliance Communications

Reliance Communications

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tigo Colombia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reliance Communications in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tigo Colombia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tigo Colombia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Reliance Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reliance Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tigo Colombia

Tigo Colombia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Reliance Communications

Reliance Communications

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tigo Colombia company and Reliance Communications company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tigo Colombia company and Reliance Communications company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tigo Colombia company and Reliance Communications company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tigo Colombia company and Reliance Communications company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tigo Colombia company and Reliance Communications company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tigo Colombia company and Reliance Communications company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tigo Colombia company and Reliance Communications company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tigo Colombia company and Reliance Communications company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tigo Colombia company and Reliance Communications company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tigo Colombia company and Reliance Communications company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tigo Colombia company and Reliance Communications company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tigo Colombia and Reliance Communications, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tigo Colombia and Reliance Communications, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tigo Colombia or Reliance Communications ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tigo Colombia or Reliance Communications ?
Between Tigo Colombia and Reliance Communications, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tigo Colombia and Reliance Communications, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2