Comparison Overview
Tiffany & Co.

Tiffany & Co.
727 5th Ave, New York, 10022, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
In 1837 Charles Lewis Tiffany founded his company in New York City where his store was soon acclaimed as the palace of jewels for its exceptional gemstones. Since then TIFFANY & CO. has become synonymous with elegance, innovative design, fine craftsmanship and creative ...

Prada Group
Via Antonio Fogazzaro, 28, Milan , 20135, IT
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Pioneer of a dialogue with contemporary society across diverse cultural spheres and an influential leader in luxury fashion, Prada Group founds its identity on essential values such as creative independence, transformation, and sustainable development, offering its bran...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Tiffany & Co.







Prada Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Avg (This Year)
Tiffany & Co. has 37.5% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Prada Group in 2026.
Incident History - Tiffany & Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tiffany & Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Prada Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Prada Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Tiffany & Co.

Prada Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.