Comparison Overview

Tianma Microelectronics

VS

Panasonic

Tianma Microelectronics

8F East, 64th Building, Jinlong Majialong Industrial Area Shenzhen, Nanshan District 518052, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tianma.com

Tianma Micro-electronics Co., Ltd (Tianma) specializes in providing display solutions and efficient support services worldwide. We were originally established in 1983 and publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZ. 000050) in 1995. Our company is committed to providing leading technology and quality displays to the consumer, industrial, and automotive industries that are used in applications to include smartphones, tablet PCs, smart wear, automotive instrumentation, industrial and medical instrumentation, avionic display, household appliances, home automation, office equipment, and rear seat entertainment devices. For the industrial market, we offer optimal products and solutions by utilizing dual-brand strategy (TIANMA brand and NLT brand) to meet various demands of our customers. We have a comprehensive production line combination including G4.5/G5 a-Si TFT – LCD, G5.5 LTPS TFT - LCD and G5.5 AM-OLED, plus two new G6 LTPS TFT-LCD lines under construction, enabling Tianma to achieve the highest possible level of product quality and supply capability. Tianma was the first to start mass production from a G5.5 LTPS production line in China. With the profound accumulation of technologies, production line development and talent reserve, Tianma will continue to focus on serving display markets worldwide based on technology innovation. With our core values of passion、effectiveness、win-win and the mission to create colorful life, Tianma is dedicated to be the world‘s well-respected leading display company.

NAICS: 335
NAICS Definition: Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Panasonic

Ooaza Kadoma, 1006, Kadoma-shi, Osaka, 571-8501, JP
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749
https://holdings.panasonic/global/

Founded in 1918, and today a global leader in developing innovative technologies and solutions for wide-ranging applications in the consumer electronics, housing, automotive, industry, communications, and energy sectors worldwide, the Panasonic Group switched to an operating company system on April 1, 2022 with Panasonic Holdings Corporation serving as a holding company and eight companies positioned under its umbrella. The Group reported consolidated net sales of 8,496.4 billion yen for the year ended March 31, 2024.

NAICS: 335
NAICS Definition: Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees: 28,891
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tianma-microelectronics.jpeg
Tianma Microelectronics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/panasonic.jpeg
Panasonic
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tianma Microelectronics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Panasonic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tianma Microelectronics in 2025.

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Panasonic has 17.65% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Tianma Microelectronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tianma Microelectronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Panasonic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Panasonic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tianma-microelectronics.jpeg
Tianma Microelectronics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/panasonic.jpeg
Panasonic
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Misconfigured DNS CNAME records
Motivation: Spread malware and perpetrate online scams
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Tianma Microelectronics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Panasonic company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Panasonic company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Tianma Microelectronics company has not reported any.

In the current year, Panasonic company has reported more cyber incidents than Tianma Microelectronics company.

Panasonic company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Tianma Microelectronics company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Panasonic company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Tianma Microelectronics company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Panasonic company nor Tianma Microelectronics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Panasonic company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Tianma Microelectronics company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Tianma Microelectronics nor Panasonic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Panasonic company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Tianma Microelectronics company.

Panasonic company employs more people globally than Tianma Microelectronics company, reflecting its scale as a Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing.

Neither Tianma Microelectronics nor Panasonic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tianma Microelectronics nor Panasonic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tianma Microelectronics nor Panasonic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tianma Microelectronics nor Panasonic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tianma Microelectronics nor Panasonic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tianma Microelectronics nor Panasonic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References