Comparison Overview

thyssenkrupp

VS

Johnson Controls

thyssenkrupp

thyssenkrupp Allee 1, None, Essen, None, DE, 45143
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://karriere.thyssenkrupp.com/en

thyssenkrupp is an international industrial and technology group with around 98,000 employees. In the fiscal year 2023/2024, the company generated sales of €35 billion in 47 countries. Its business activities are bundled in five segments: Automotive Technology, Decarbon Technologies, Materials Services, Steel Europe and Marine Systems. With extensive technology know-how, the businesses develop innovative solutions for the challenges of the future. Around 3,900 employees work in research and development worldwide. They are mainly focused on climate protection and the energy transition, the digital transformation in industry and the mobility of the future. The patent portfolio of thyssenkrupp currently includes approximately 16,900 patents and utility models. thyssenkrupp is pursuing ambitious climate protection targets and actively optimizing its own energy and climate efficiency. At the same time, the Group is supporting its customers with advanced products to help them achieve their climate targets, thus playing a key role in advancing the green transformation. As a publicly listed company, thyssenkrupp is part of the MDAX index. thyssenkrupp shares are traded on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (ticker symbol: TKA) and as American depositary receipts (ticker symbol: TKAMY) in the USA. If you have any HR related questions, please send us an e-mail to [email protected] or visit our global career site: https://karriere.thyssenkrupp.com/en Follow us on our social media career channels: Facebook: facebook.com/thyssenkruppcareer/ blog: https://www.thyssenkrupp.com/en/stories Imprint: https://www.thyssenkrupp.com/de/impressum.html Privacy policy: https://www.thyssenkrupp.com/en/legal-notes.html

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 36,513
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Johnson Controls

Milwaukee, Cork, Ireland, IE, T12 X8N6
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.johnsoncontrols.com

At Johnson Controls, we transform the environments where people live, work, learn and play. As the global leader in smart, healthy and sustainable buildings, our mission is to reimagine the performance of buildings to serve people, places and the planet. Building on a proud history of 140 years of innovation, we deliver the blueprint of the future for industries such as healthcare, schools, data centers, airports, stadiums, manufacturing and beyond through OpenBlue, our comprehensive digital offering. Today, Johnson Controls offers the world`s largest portfolio of building technology and software as well as service solutions from some of the most trusted names in the industry. Visit www.johnsoncontrols.com for more information.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 65,242
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thyssenkrupp.jpeg
thyssenkrupp
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnson-controls.jpeg
Johnson Controls
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
thyssenkrupp
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Johnson Controls
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for thyssenkrupp in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Johnson Controls has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — thyssenkrupp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

thyssenkrupp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Johnson Controls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson Controls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thyssenkrupp.jpeg
thyssenkrupp
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2015
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: theft of highly sensitive military/defense information (Royal Australian Navy submarine technical requirements)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnson-controls.jpeg
Johnson Controls
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Publicly Accessible Devices, Default Credentials, Unpatched Software Vulnerabilities, Lack of Firewalls/Encryption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Johnson Controls company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to thyssenkrupp company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Johnson Controls company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to thyssenkrupp company.

In the current year, Johnson Controls company has reported more cyber incidents than thyssenkrupp company.

Johnson Controls company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while thyssenkrupp company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Johnson Controls company nor thyssenkrupp company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

thyssenkrupp company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Johnson Controls company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Johnson Controls company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while thyssenkrupp company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither thyssenkrupp nor Johnson Controls holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Johnson Controls company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to thyssenkrupp company.

Johnson Controls company employs more people globally than thyssenkrupp company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither thyssenkrupp nor Johnson Controls holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither thyssenkrupp nor Johnson Controls holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither thyssenkrupp nor Johnson Controls holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither thyssenkrupp nor Johnson Controls holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither thyssenkrupp nor Johnson Controls holds HIPAA certification.

Neither thyssenkrupp nor Johnson Controls holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References