Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp PhátTập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát
VS
SyscoSysco
Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

219 Đại lộ Bình Dương, Thuận An,, Binh Duong, Binh Duong Province, 700000, VN

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.thp.com.vn/
765/1000Fair

Chào mừng các bạn đến THP. Được thành lập năm 1994, Tập đoàn nước giải khát Tân Hiệp Phát ("THP"​) là công ty Việt Nam lớn nhất trong ngành hàng Tiêu dùng nhanh (FMCG). THP tự hào phát triển, sản xuất và bán ra thị trường 3 thương hiệu Quốc gia Việt Nam - Trà Thảo mộc D...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:504
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sysco

Sysco

1390 Enclave Parkway, Houston, 77079, US

Last Update: 28/06/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.sysco.com
686/1000Weak

Sysco is the global leader in selling, marketing and distributing food and related products to customers who prepare meals away from home. This includes restaurants, healthcare and educational facilities, lodging establishments, entertainment venues, and more. Sysco ope...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:32,467
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sysco

Sysco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Sysco has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sysco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sysco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sysco

Sysco

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SYS1782671069
🔒 Incident : Breach
SYS5792657090725
🔒 Incident : Breach
SYS222728523

FAQ

Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Sysco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Sysco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Sysco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Sysco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Sysco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Sysco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Sysco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Sysco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Sysco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Sysco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Sysco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát and Sysco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát and Sysco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát or Sysco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát or Sysco ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát and Sysco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát and Sysco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2