Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp PhátTập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát
VS
Suntory Holdings LimitedSuntory Holdings Limited
Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

219 Đại lộ Bình Dương, Thuận An,, Binh Duong, Binh Duong Province, 700000, VN

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.thp.com.vn/
765/1000Fair

Chào mừng các bạn đến THP. Được thành lập năm 1994, Tập đoàn nước giải khát Tân Hiệp Phát ("THP"​) là công ty Việt Nam lớn nhất trong ngành hàng Tiêu dùng nhanh (FMCG). THP tự hào phát triển, sản xuất và bán ra thị trường 3 thương hiệu Quốc gia Việt Nam - Trà Thảo mộc D...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:504
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Suntory Holdings Limited

Suntory Holdings Limited

daiba 2-3-3, Minato-ku,, JP

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.suntory.com
788/1000Fair

As a global leader in the beverage industry, Suntory Group aims to inspire the brilliance of life, by creating rich experiences for people, in harmony with nature. Sustained by the gifts of nature and water, the Group offers a uniquely diverse portfolio of products, fro...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:10,553
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Suntory Holdings Limited

Suntory Holdings Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Suntory Holdings Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Suntory Holdings Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Suntory Holdings Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Suntory Holdings Limited

Suntory Holdings Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Suntory Holdings Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát and Suntory Holdings Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát and Suntory Holdings Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát or Suntory Holdings Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát or Suntory Holdings Limited ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát and Suntory Holdings Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát and Suntory Holdings Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59705
SUMMARY

mem0's openmemory/api component contains an unauthenticated access vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to read, write, and delete arbitrary user memories by accessing API routers registered without authentication middleware. Attackers can supply arbitrary user_id parameters or directly access memory retrieval endpoints to expose private memory content, or invoke pause endpoints with global_pause=true to cause denial-of-service across all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59704
SUMMARY

Cap's GET /api/video/ai endpoint fails to validate user ownership or membership before returning private video AI metadata including titles, summaries, and chapters. Authenticated attackers can supply arbitrary video IDs to read sensitive AI-generated content and trigger unauthorized AI generation that consumes the video owner's credits without consent.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-55078
SUMMARY

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Starting in version 2.17.0 and prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, `POST /api/v2/files` converts zip uploads to tar in memory via `CreateTarFromZip`, which enforced a per-entry size limit but no aggregate limit on total decompressed output, writing to an unbounded in-memory buffer. Exploitation requires authenticated file-upload access and the impact is limited to availability (denial of service). The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 adds a metadata preflight check that sums projected entry sizes and a streaming writer that enforces the aggregate limit during decompression. As a workaround, restrict file-upload permissions to trusted users or place a reverse proxy with request-body size limits in front of `coderd`.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-55077
SUMMARY

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, the `PUT /api/v2/users/{user}/password` endpoint authorized only `ActionUpdatePersonal` and did not prevent a `user-admin` from resetting an `owner` account's password. It also did not require the current password when an admin reset another user's password. Exploitation requires the privileged `user-admin` role so practical risk is limited to deployments that grant `user-admin` to less trusted operators. The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 prevents non-owner users from resetting the password of an account that holds the `owner` role. As a workaround, restrict the `user-admin` role to trusted administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-55076
SUMMARY

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, Coder's OIDC callback checked `email_verified` with a direct Go `bool` type assertion. When an IdP returned the claim as a non-boolean (for example the string `"false"`) or omitted it, the assertion failed open and the email was treated as verified. Combined with an unconditional email-based account fallback, this enabled account takeover. The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 coerces `email_verified` across bool, string and numeric types (fail-closed) and blocks the email fallback when the matched user already has a different linked IdP subject. As a workaround, ensure the IdP returns `email_verified` as a native JSON boolean. The email-fallback linking issue has no configuration workaround; upgrading is required.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2