Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp PhátTập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát
VS
GreggsGreggs
Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

219 Đại lộ Bình Dương, Thuận An,, Binh Duong, Binh Duong Province, 700000, VN

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.thp.com.vn/
765/1000Fair

Chào mừng các bạn đến THP. Được thành lập năm 1994, Tập đoàn nước giải khát Tân Hiệp Phát ("THP"​) là công ty Việt Nam lớn nhất trong ngành hàng Tiêu dùng nhanh (FMCG). THP tự hào phát triển, sản xuất và bán ra thị trường 3 thương hiệu Quốc gia Việt Nam - Trà Thảo mộc D...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:504
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Greggs

Greggs

GB

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.greggs.co.uk
772/1000Fair

Greggs is a leading food-on-the-go retailer with over 2,400 shops nationwide and serving over six million customers a week. We stand for great tasting, freshly prepared food that our customers can trust, at affordable prices and aim to become the customers’ favourite ...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:12,822
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Greggs

Greggs

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greggs in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Greggs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greggs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Greggs

Greggs

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Greggs company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Greggs company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Greggs company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Greggs company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Greggs company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Greggs company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Greggs company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Greggs company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Greggs company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Greggs company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát company and Greggs company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát and Greggs, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát and Greggs, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát or Greggs ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát or Greggs ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát and Greggs, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tập đoàn Tân Hiệp Phát and Greggs, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8