Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Thorn LightingThorn Lighting
VS
LegrandLegrand
Thorn Lighting

Thorn Lighting

Thorn Lighting Limited, Spennymoor, DL16 6HL, GB

Last Update: 25/02/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

With nearly 100 years’ experience in manufacturing and supplying efficient, high-quality and connected solutions, Thorn knows lighting, inside out. Our knowledgeable people provide best-in-class support throughout the entire customer journey, while our extensive portfol...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:508
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Legrand

Legrand

128 avenue du Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, Limoges, 87045, FR

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.legrandgroup.com
804/1000Good

Legrand is a global specialist in electrical and digital building infrastructures, dedicated to supporting technological, societal and environmental change around the globe. Our purpose is to improve lives by transforming the spaces where people live, work and meet by...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:14,568
Subsidiaries:48
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Thorn Lighting

Thorn Lighting

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Legrand

Legrand

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thorn Lighting in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legrand in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Thorn Lighting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thorn Lighting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Legrand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legrand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Thorn Lighting

Thorn Lighting

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Legrand

Legrand

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Thorn Lighting company and Legrand company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Thorn Lighting company and Legrand company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Thorn Lighting company and Legrand company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Thorn Lighting company and Legrand company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Thorn Lighting company and Legrand company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Thorn Lighting company and Legrand company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Thorn Lighting company and Legrand company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Thorn Lighting company and Legrand company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Thorn Lighting company and Legrand company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Thorn Lighting company and Legrand company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Thorn Lighting company and Legrand company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Thorn Lighting and Legrand, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Thorn Lighting and Legrand, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Thorn Lighting or Legrand ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Thorn Lighting or Legrand ?
Between Thorn Lighting and Legrand, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Thorn Lighting and Legrand, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA