Comparison Overview
Thomson Reuters Institute

Thomson Reuters Institute
3 Times Sq, New York, 10001, US
Last Update: 12/01/2026
The Thomson Reuters Institute engages professionals from the legal, corporate, tax & accounting, and government communities to host conversation and debate, analyze trends, and provide the insights and guidance needed to help shape the way forward in an evolving and inc...

Thoughtworks
200 E Randolph St, 25th Floor, Chicago, IL, US, 60601-6501
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We are a global technology consultancy that delivers extraordinary impact by blending design, engineering and AI expertise. For 30 years, our commitment to design-led thinking, engineering excellence and innovation means we prioritize people, build teams with strong te...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Thomson Reuters Institute







Thoughtworks






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Thomson Reuters Institute in 2026.
Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Thoughtworks in 2026.
Incident History - Thomson Reuters Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Thomson Reuters Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Thoughtworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Thoughtworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Thomson Reuters Institute

Thoughtworks
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.