Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Soluções Domínio da Thomson ReutersSoluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters
VS
Persistent SystemsPersistent Systems
Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters

Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters

Av. Centenário, 7405, Bairro Nossa Senhora da Salete - Criciúma/SC, None, Criciúma, SC, BR, 88813-325

Last Update: 02/05/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Unidade de negócio da Thomson Reuters voltada para o mercado contábil. Apoiada nas Soluções Domínio, contamos com uma suíte de sistemas tecnológicos e integrados que permitem um melhor gerenciamento, eficiência e segurança para todos os tipos de profissionais do segme...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Persistent Systems

Persistent Systems

Bhageerath, 402 E, Senapati Bapat Road, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411016

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.persistent.com
776/1000Fair

We are an AI-led, platform-driven Digital Engineering and Enterprise Modernization partner, combining deep technical expertise and industry experience to help our clients anticipate what’s next. Our offerings and proven solutions create a unique competitive advantage fo...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:27,562
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters

Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Persistent Systems

Persistent Systems

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Persistent Systems in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Persistent Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Persistent Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters

Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Persistent Systems

Persistent Systems

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Persistent Systems company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Persistent Systems company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Persistent Systems company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Persistent Systems company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Persistent Systems company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters and Persistent Systems, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters and Persistent Systems, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters or Persistent Systems ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters or Persistent Systems ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters and Persistent Systems, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters and Persistent Systems, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA