Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Soluções Domínio da Thomson ReutersSoluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters
VS
NeobpoNeobpo
Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters

Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters

Av. Centenário, 7405, Bairro Nossa Senhora da Salete - Criciúma/SC, None, Criciúma, SC, BR, 88813-325

Last Update: 02/05/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Unidade de negócio da Thomson Reuters voltada para o mercado contábil. Apoiada nas Soluções Domínio, contamos com uma suíte de sistemas tecnológicos e integrados que permitem um melhor gerenciamento, eficiência e segurança para todos os tipos de profissionais do segme...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Neobpo

Neobpo

Rua Pais Leme, 14, São Paulo, SP, BR, 05424-010

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.neobpo
771/1000Fair

Somos especializados em integrar tecnologia com inteligência humana, oferecendo soluções digitais que promovem transformação e eficiência operacional. Nosso foco é gerar valor por meio de resultados reais, utilizando inteligência digital para atender às necessidades esp...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:10,245
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters

Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Neobpo

Neobpo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neobpo in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Neobpo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neobpo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters

Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Neobpo

Neobpo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Neobpo company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Neobpo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Neobpo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Neobpo company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Neobpo company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Neobpo company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Neobpo company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Neobpo company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Neobpo company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Neobpo company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters company and Neobpo company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters and Neobpo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters and Neobpo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters or Neobpo ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters or Neobpo ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters and Neobpo, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Soluções Domínio da Thomson Reuters and Neobpo, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2