Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Thompson Coburn LLPThompson Coburn LLP
VS
DLA PiperDLA Piper
Thompson Coburn LLP

Thompson Coburn LLP

One US Bank Plaza, Saint Louis, MO, US, 63101

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
646/1000Poor

Thompson Coburn is a full-service, values-driven law firm with offices strategically located in Birmingham, Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, New York, Southern Illinois, St. Louis, and Washington, D.C. The firm represents a sophisticated client base — including Fortune 500...

NAICS:54111
NAICS Definition:Offices of Lawyers
Employees:1,011
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

160 Aldersgate Street, London, EC1A 4HT, GB

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dlapiper.com
782/1000Fair

DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver excepti...

NAICS:54111
NAICS Definition:Offices of Lawyers
Employees:13,333
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Thompson Coburn LLP

Thompson Coburn LLP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thompson Coburn LLP in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DLA Piper in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Thompson Coburn LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thompson Coburn LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DLA Piper (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DLA Piper cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Thompson Coburn LLP

Thompson Coburn LLP

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
THO224072725
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRETHO1770850946
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Thompson Coburn LLP company and DLA Piper company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Thompson Coburn LLP company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Thompson Coburn LLP company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Thompson Coburn LLP company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Thompson Coburn LLP company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Thompson Coburn LLP company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Thompson Coburn LLP company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Thompson Coburn LLP company and DLA Piper company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Thompson Coburn LLP company and DLA Piper company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Thompson Coburn LLP company and DLA Piper company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Thompson Coburn LLP company and DLA Piper company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Thompson Coburn LLP and DLA Piper, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Thompson Coburn LLP and DLA Piper, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Thompson Coburn LLP or DLA Piper ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Thompson Coburn LLP or DLA Piper ?
Between Thompson Coburn LLP and DLA Piper, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Thompson Coburn LLP and DLA Piper, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9