Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Thomas Safran & Associates » THO1764780984

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (THO1764780984)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-97
Company Score Before Incident755 / 1000
Company Score After Incident658 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERTHO1764780984
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPrivate and personal confidential data,...
INCIDENT DATE07/09/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Thomas Safran & Associates's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Thomas Safran & Associates Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Thomas Safran & Associates breach identified under incident ID THO1764780984.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Thomas Safran & Associates's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/thomas-safran-&-associates, the number of followers: 2512, the industry type: Real Estate and the number of employees: 122 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 755 and after the incident was 658 with a difference of -97 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Thomas Safran & Associates and their customers.

On 24 November 2025, Thomas Safran & Associates disclosed Ransomware, Data Breach issues under the banner "Thomas Safran & Associates Data Breach and Ransomware Attack".

Thomas Safran & Associates, a real estate development and management company, experienced a significant data breach involving unauthorized access to a confidential computer server.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Confidential computer server, and exposing Private and personal confidential data, client documents, budget, payroll, accounting, tax records, IDs, financial information, personally identifiable information (PII).

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Immediate steps to secure the environment.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to a confidential computer server and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attack vector not specified, but ransomware often exploits public-facing apps. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack carried out by PLAY group. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access maintained on server. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating access to confidential server implies elevated privileges. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack by PLAY group (commonly uses obfuscation) and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating suspicious activity detected, implying defense evasion. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating access to payroll, accounting, and tax records implies credential theft. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating access to PII, client documents, and financial data implies discovery phase. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to confidential server suggests lateral movement. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating stolen data includes PII, client docs, payroll, accounting, tax records. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating pLAY group threatened to publish stolen data on the dark web and Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed by ransomware group. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack by PLAY group and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack may involve data destruction. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References