Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight companyThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company
VS
UKGUKG
ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company

ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company

111 Huntington Ave, Boston, 02199, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
643/1000Poor

ThirdPartyTrust is a third-party risk management platform for companies and vendors to perform assessments, automate TPRM workflows, and share security documents. We get programs out of email & spreadsheets and accelerate the third-party assessment/questionnaire review ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:6
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
UKG

UKG

N/A

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://ukg.com
663/1000Weak

UKG is the Workforce Operating Platform that puts workforce understanding to work. With the world's largest collection of workforce insights, and people-first AI, our ability to reveal unseen ways to build trust, amplify productivity, and empower talent, is unmatched. I...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:16,048
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company

ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UKG

UKG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UKG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UKG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UKG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company

ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
THIIBE1774081558
UKG

UKG

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UKG921072725
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UKG550080525
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UKG1770674656

FAQ

Between ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company company and UKG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company company and UKG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company company and UKG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company company and UKG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company company and UKG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company company and UKG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company company and UKG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company company and UKG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company company and UKG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company company and UKG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company company and UKG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company and UKG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company and UKG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company or UKG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company or UKG ?
Between ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company and UKG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ThirdPartyTrust, a Bitsight company and UKG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9