Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc.Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc.
VS
LCLLCL
Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc.

Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc.

9211 West Rd, Houston, 77064, US

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.3princ.com
669/1000Weak

Third Party Resources, Inc. (3PR, Inc.) is a specialized consulting firm that focuses on the unique regulatory compliance and risk management challenges facing banks and other financial services related institutions. Since we can perform many of our engagements remotely...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:11
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
LCL

LCL

20, Avenue de Paris, VILLEJUIF, Île-de-France, FR, 94800

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lcl.fr/
780/1000Fair

Depuis son rapprochement avec le Groupe Crédit Agricole SA en 2003, le périmètre d'activités de LCL, réseau national de banque de détail, est axé sur le marché des particuliers, des professionnels, des entreprises et la Banque privée. LCL est une banque de proximité ...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:16,195
Subsidiaries:46
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc.

Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LCL

LCL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. has 62.16% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LCL in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LCL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LCL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc.

Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SOF1780957667
🔒 Incident : Breach
M&TTHI1776869694
🔒 Incident : Breach
FRO1777566496
LCL

LCL

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and LCL company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and LCL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and LCL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and LCL company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and LCL company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and LCL company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and LCL company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and LCL company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and LCL company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and LCL company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and LCL company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. and LCL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. and LCL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. or LCL ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. or LCL ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. and LCL, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. and LCL, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8