Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc.Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc.
VS
National Bank of CanadaNational Bank of Canada
Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc.

Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc.

9211 West Rd, Houston, 77064, US

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.3princ.com
669/1000Weak

Third Party Resources, Inc. (3PR, Inc.) is a specialized consulting firm that focuses on the unique regulatory compliance and risk management challenges facing banks and other financial services related institutions. Since we can perform many of our engagements remotely...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:11
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
National Bank of Canada

National Bank of Canada

800 Rue Saint-Jacques, Montreal, Quebec, CA, H3C 1A3

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bnc.ca
813/1000Good

At National Bank, we believe in the potential of each individual, and that even the smallest gestures can make a big difference. When we help others accomplish their projects, we help empower them and the community at large. We try to make a difference through innova...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:19,047
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc.

Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
National Bank of Canada

National Bank of Canada

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. has 84.05% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Bank of Canada in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - National Bank of Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Bank of Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc.

Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SOF1780957667
🔒 Incident : Breach
M&TTHI1776869694
🔒 Incident : Breach
FRO1777566496
National Bank of Canada

National Bank of Canada

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and National Bank of Canada company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and National Bank of Canada company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and National Bank of Canada company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and National Bank of Canada company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and National Bank of Canada company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and National Bank of Canada company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and National Bank of Canada company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and National Bank of Canada company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and National Bank of Canada company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and National Bank of Canada company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. company and National Bank of Canada company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. and National Bank of Canada, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. and National Bank of Canada, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. or National Bank of Canada ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. or National Bank of Canada ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. and National Bank of Canada, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Third Party Resources, Inc. | 3PR, Inc. and National Bank of Canada, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9