Comparison Overview

Thermax Limited

VS

Danfoss

Thermax Limited

IN, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Incorporated in 1966, Thermax Group is a 1 billion US$ company headquartered in Pune, India. Over the years, it has grown into a leading conglomerate in the energy and environment space and a trusted partner in energy transition. Strategically spreading its operations to 90+ countries while catering to a gamut of industries, the company offers integrated solutions in heating, cooling, power generation, water treatment and recycling, air pollution control, and chemicals with a focus on ensuring clean air, clean energy, and clean water. The solutions, products and services developed by Thermax help industries achieve better resource productivity and improve bottom line while maintaining a cleaner environment. Today, Thermax has a sales and service network spread over Asia, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and the Americas. It operates globally through 34 international and 22 domestic offices, and has 14 manufacturing facilities – 10 of which are in India and four overseas. The group consists of 17 domestic subsidiaries and 20 international subsidiaries.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 10,962
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Danfoss

Nordborgvej 81, Nordborg, undefined, 6430, DK
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Danfoss engineers solutions that increase machine productivity, reduce emissions, lower energy consumption, and enable electrification. Our solutions are used in such areas as refrigeration, air conditioning, heating, power conversion, motor control, industrial machinery, automotive, marine, and off- and on-highway equipment. We also provide solutions for renewable energy, such as solar and wind power, as well as district-energy infrastructure for cities. Our innovative engineering dates back to 1933. Danfoss is family-owned, employing more than 42,000 people, serving customers in more than 100 countries through a global footprint of 95 factories. Follow us on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook: www.instagram.com/danfoss_group www.twitter.com/Danfoss www.facebook.com/Danfoss

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 21,723
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thermaxlimited.jpeg
Thermax Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danfoss.jpeg
Danfoss
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Thermax Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Danfoss
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thermax Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danfoss in 2025.

Incident History — Thermax Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thermax Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Danfoss (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danfoss cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thermaxlimited.jpeg
Thermax Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danfoss.jpeg
Danfoss
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Danfoss company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Thermax Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Danfoss company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Thermax Limited company.

In the current year, Danfoss company and Thermax Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Danfoss company nor Thermax Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Danfoss company nor Thermax Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Danfoss company nor Thermax Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Thermax Limited company nor Danfoss company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Thermax Limited nor Danfoss holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Thermax Limited company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Danfoss company.

Danfoss company employs more people globally than Thermax Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Thermax Limited nor Danfoss holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Thermax Limited nor Danfoss holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Thermax Limited nor Danfoss holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Thermax Limited nor Danfoss holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Thermax Limited nor Danfoss holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Thermax Limited nor Danfoss holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H