Comparison Overview
The Joint Staff

The Joint Staff
The Pentagon, Washington, 20318, US
Last Update: 26/03/2026
The Joint Staff assists the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in accomplishing his responsibilities for: the unified strategic direction of the combatant forces; their operation under unified command; and for their integration into an efficient team of land, naval, ...

United States Marine Corps
3000 Marine Corps Pentagon, Washington, 20350, US
Last Update: 01/06/2026
The United States Marine Corps (USMC) is a branch of the United States Armed Forces responsible for providing power projection, using the mobility of the United States Navy, by Congressional mandate, to deliver rapidly, combined-arms task forces on land, at sea, and in ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

The Joint Staff







United States Marine Corps






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The Joint Staff in 2026.
Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)
United States Marine Corps has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - The Joint Staff (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The Joint Staff cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - United States Marine Corps (X = Date, Y = Severity)
United States Marine Corps cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

The Joint Staff

United States Marine Corps
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.