Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KYThe J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY
VS
BungeBunge
The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY

The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY

1070 Smiths Grove Road, Scottsville, 42164, US

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.jmsmucker.com/
743/1000Moderate

Throughout our history we have shown a willingness to go against the grain when we strongly believe in a concept. In 1998, we saw an opportunity to enter an interesting new space with the purchase of a frozen crustless sandwich maker. The idea was simple enough – peanut...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:15
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Bunge

Bunge

1391 Timberlake Manor Pkwy, Chesterfield, Missouri, US, 63017

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bunge.com
793/1000Fair

At Bunge (NYSE: BG), our purpose is to connect farmers to consumers to deliver essential food, feed and fuel to the world. As a premier agribusiness solutions provider, our team of ~37,000 dedicated employees partner with farmers across the globe to move agricultural co...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:24,659
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY

The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bunge

Bunge

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bunge in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bunge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bunge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY

The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE955091725
Bunge

Bunge

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY company and Bunge company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY company and Bunge company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY company and Bunge company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY company and Bunge company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY company and Bunge company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY company and Bunge company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY company and Bunge company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY company and Bunge company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY company and Bunge company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY company and Bunge company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY company and Bunge company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY and Bunge, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY and Bunge, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY or Bunge ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY or Bunge ?
Between The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY and Bunge, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The J.M. Smucker Company - Scottsville, KY and Bunge, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1