Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TFG (The Foschini Group)TFG (The Foschini Group)
VS
Woolworths GroupWoolworths Group
TFG (The Foschini Group)

TFG (The Foschini Group)

340 Voortrekker Road, Cape Town, 7500, ZA

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
806/1000Good

TFG holds a diversified portfolio of speciality retail assets across various product categories and consumer segments. The Group has a portfolio of 35 leading retail brands, with over 4600 outlets in 23 countries on five continents, offering customers a variety of speci...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:27,762
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Woolworths Group

Woolworths Group

1 Woolworths Way, Bella Vista, NSW, AU, 2153

Last Update: 27/09/2026

View Profile
817/1000Good

Woolworths Group is one of Australia and New Zealand’s leading retail groups, supporting well-known brands such as Woolworths and BIG W. Our great team is focused on creating better experiences together, for our customers, our communities and for each other. People are...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:62,566
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TFG (The Foschini Group)

TFG (The Foschini Group)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Woolworths Group

Woolworths Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TFG (The Foschini Group) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Woolworths Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TFG (The Foschini Group) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TFG (The Foschini Group) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Woolworths Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Woolworths Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TFG (The Foschini Group)

TFG (The Foschini Group)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Woolworths Group

Woolworths Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WOO1351522

FAQ

Between TFG (The Foschini Group) company and Woolworths Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TFG (The Foschini Group) company and Woolworths Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TFG (The Foschini Group) company and Woolworths Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TFG (The Foschini Group) company and Woolworths Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TFG (The Foschini Group) company and Woolworths Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TFG (The Foschini Group) company and Woolworths Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TFG (The Foschini Group) company and Woolworths Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TFG (The Foschini Group) company and Woolworths Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TFG (The Foschini Group) company and Woolworths Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TFG (The Foschini Group) company and Woolworths Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TFG (The Foschini Group) company and Woolworths Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TFG (The Foschini Group) and Woolworths Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TFG (The Foschini Group) and Woolworths Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TFG (The Foschini Group) or Woolworths Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TFG (The Foschini Group) or Woolworths Group ?
Between TFG (The Foschini Group) and Woolworths Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TFG (The Foschini Group) and Woolworths Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA