Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Zephyr ProjectThe Zephyr Project
VS
Expleo GroupExpleo Group
The Zephyr Project

The Zephyr Project

1 Letterman Dr , San Francisco, 94129, US

Last Update: 06/07/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

The Zephyr Project is an open source collaborative effort uniting leaders from across the industry to build a best-in-breed small, scalable, real-time operating system (RTOS) optimized for resource constrained devices, across multiple architectures. Hosted by The Linux ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:28
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Expleo Group

Expleo Group

3 avenue des Prés, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, Saint Quentin en Yvelines, Ile-de-France, FR, 78180

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://expleo.com/
786/1000Fair

Expleo is a global engineering, technology and consulting service provider that partners with leading organisations to guide them through their business transformation, helping them achieve operational excellence and future-proof their businesses. Expleo benefits fro...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:14,056
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Zephyr Project

The Zephyr Project

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Expleo Group

Expleo Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

The Zephyr Project has 34.21% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Expleo Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Zephyr Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Zephyr Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Expleo Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Expleo Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Zephyr Project

The Zephyr Project

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ZERTHEESPSTMARD1783341911
Expleo Group

Expleo Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between The Zephyr Project company and Expleo Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Zephyr Project company and Expleo Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Zephyr Project company and Expleo Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Zephyr Project company and Expleo Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Zephyr Project company and Expleo Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Zephyr Project company and Expleo Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Zephyr Project company and Expleo Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Zephyr Project company and Expleo Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Zephyr Project company and Expleo Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Zephyr Project company and Expleo Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Zephyr Project company and Expleo Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Zephyr Project and Expleo Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Zephyr Project and Expleo Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Zephyr Project or Expleo Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Zephyr Project or Expleo Group ?
Between The Zephyr Project and Expleo Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Zephyr Project and Expleo Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8