Comparison Overview
The Weir Group PLC

The Weir Group PLC
1 West Regent Street, Glasgow, G2 1RW, GB
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Weir is a global leader in mining technology. We recognise that our planet’s future depends on the transition to renewable energy, and that transition can only happen with the metals and minerals our mining customers deliver. We combine our deep customer insights, worl...

Jindal Steel Ltd.
Jindal Centre, 12, Bhikaiji Cama Place, Delhi, New Delhi, IN, 110066
Last Update: 20/09/2026
Jindal Steel is one of India’s foremost integrated steel producers, renowned for its scale, efficiency, and commitment to excellence. Operating on a robust mine-to-metal model, the Company leverages captive resources, advanced manufacturing capabilities, and a global di...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

The Weir Group PLC







Jindal Steel Ltd.






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The Weir Group PLC in 2026.
Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Jindal Steel Ltd. in 2026.
Incident History - The Weir Group PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The Weir Group PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Jindal Steel Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Jindal Steel Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

The Weir Group PLC

Jindal Steel Ltd.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.