Comparison Overview

The Washington Institute For Near East Policy

VS

Governance and Public Policy Initiative

The Washington Institute For Near East Policy

1111 19th Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Institute's mission is to advance a balanced and realistic understanding of American interests in the Middle East and to promote the policies that secure them. A nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, the Institute provides America’s leaders with information on the broad range of critical issues facing the United States in the Middle East, delivered through personal briefings, publications, videos, and media appearances. Institute experts — who hail from every corner of the region and have experience in all branches of the government — are regularly consulted by officials, military personnel, academics, and journalists from across the globe. For more than 30 years, the Institute has been at the forefront of Washington’s “battle of ideas,” informing decisions, shaping the agenda, and improving the quality of U.S. Middle East policy. As an organization committed to advancing American interests, the Institute is proud to accept donations only from American citizens, foundations, corporations, and institutions. Learn more at washingtoninstitute.org.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 110
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Governance and Public Policy Initiative

None, None, New Delhi, None, IN, None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Governance & Public Policy Initiative (GPPI) was set up under the aegis of the Centre for Policy Research (CPR), India’s premier think tank in August 2012. GPPI has been established to develop innovative approaches to effective and accountable governance, promotion of political and social entrepreneurship and to foster a strategic community that brings together Indian law makers, eminent scholars and academicians, think tank analysts, the bureaucracy and civil society through sustained discussions and debates. Presently, GPPI-CPR’s primary focus is on health related issues induced by the global coronavirus pandemic. It engages with Members of Parliament, key leaders from various Indian political parties, Members of the Indian Legislative Assemblies and the country’s current and emerging leaders in our efforts to hone the governance and public policy discourse in India. GPPI takes no institutional positions on matters of policy. Director: Mr Ramesh Chandran (Senior Fellow, Centre for Policy Research) https://www.linkedin.com/in/rameshchandran1/ Email: [email protected]

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-washington-institute-for-near-east-policy.jpeg
The Washington Institute For Near East Policy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/governance-and-public-policy-initiative.jpeg
Governance and Public Policy Initiative
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Washington Institute For Near East Policy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Governance and Public Policy Initiative
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Washington Institute For Near East Policy in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Governance and Public Policy Initiative in 2025.

Incident History — The Washington Institute For Near East Policy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Washington Institute For Near East Policy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Governance and Public Policy Initiative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Governance and Public Policy Initiative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-washington-institute-for-near-east-policy.jpeg
The Washington Institute For Near East Policy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/governance-and-public-policy-initiative.jpeg
Governance and Public Policy Initiative
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Governance and Public Policy Initiative company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Washington Institute For Near East Policy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Governance and Public Policy Initiative company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Washington Institute For Near East Policy company.

In the current year, Governance and Public Policy Initiative company and The Washington Institute For Near East Policy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Governance and Public Policy Initiative company nor The Washington Institute For Near East Policy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Governance and Public Policy Initiative company nor The Washington Institute For Near East Policy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Governance and Public Policy Initiative company nor The Washington Institute For Near East Policy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Washington Institute For Near East Policy company nor Governance and Public Policy Initiative company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Washington Institute For Near East Policy nor Governance and Public Policy Initiative holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Washington Institute For Near East Policy company nor Governance and Public Policy Initiative company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither The Washington Institute For Near East Policy nor Governance and Public Policy Initiative holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Washington Institute For Near East Policy nor Governance and Public Policy Initiative holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Washington Institute For Near East Policy nor Governance and Public Policy Initiative holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Washington Institute For Near East Policy nor Governance and Public Policy Initiative holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Washington Institute For Near East Policy nor Governance and Public Policy Initiative holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Washington Institute For Near East Policy nor Governance and Public Policy Initiative holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X