Comparison Overview

The Walt Disney Company

VS

Topgolf

The Walt Disney Company

The Walt Disney Company, Burbank, CA, 91521, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.disneycareers.com

The Walt Disney Company, together with its subsidiaries and affiliates, is a leading diversified international family entertainment and media enterprise that includes three core business segments: Disney Entertainment, ESPN, and Disney Experiences. Our mission is to entertain, inform and inspire people around the globe through the power of unparalleled storytelling, reflecting the iconic brands, creative minds and innovative technologies that make us the world’s premier entertainment company.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 177,769
Subsidiaries: 64
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Topgolf

8750 N. Central Expressway, Dallas, Texas, US, 75231
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://linktr.ee/topgolf

Topgolf is the ultimate instigator of play. Thanks to our 100+ venues around the globe, which are powered by industry-leading Toptracer technology, we're leading the charge of modern golf. We offer a variety of tech-driven games, a top-tier food and drink menu, space to host large events, and a vibe focused on more play for all. To learn more, plan an event, or make plans to come play around, visit topgolf.com.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 11,787
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-walt-disney-company.jpeg
The Walt Disney Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/topgolf.jpeg
Topgolf
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Walt Disney Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Topgolf
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

The Walt Disney Company has 13.64% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Topgolf in 2025.

Incident History — The Walt Disney Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Walt Disney Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Topgolf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Topgolf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-walt-disney-company.jpeg
The Walt Disney Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing, Malware
Motivation: Data exfiltration, Financial gain, Public disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malicious AI tool installation
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/topgolf.jpeg
Topgolf
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Topgolf company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Walt Disney Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The Walt Disney Company company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Topgolf company has not reported any.

In the current year, The Walt Disney Company company has reported more cyber incidents than Topgolf company.

The Walt Disney Company company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Topgolf company has not reported such incidents publicly.

The Walt Disney Company company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Topgolf company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Topgolf company nor The Walt Disney Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Walt Disney Company company nor Topgolf company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Topgolf holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Walt Disney Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Topgolf company.

The Walt Disney Company company employs more people globally than Topgolf company, reflecting its scale as a Entertainment Providers.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Topgolf holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Topgolf holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Topgolf holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Topgolf holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Topgolf holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Topgolf holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References