Comparison Overview
The University of Adelaide College

The University of Adelaide College
132 Grenfell St, Adelaide, South Australia, AU, 5000
Last Update: 08/05/2026
The University of Adelaide College offers world-class pathway programs in the heart of Adelaide and Melbourne. With pathways to both Adelaide University and the University of Adelaide, taking this first step can really empower students to follow their own path to succes...

UNSW
Gate 9, High St Kensington 2052, Sydney, New South Wales (NSW), AU, 2052
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The University of New South Wales (UNSW) is one of Australia's leading research and teaching universities. Established in 1949, UNSW has expanded rapidly and now has more than 52,000 students, including more than 14,000 international students from over 130 different c...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

The University of Adelaide College







UNSW






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
The University of Adelaide College has 40.83% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UNSW in 2026.
Incident History - The University of Adelaide College (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The University of Adelaide College cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - UNSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UNSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

The University of Adelaide College

UNSW
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.