Comparison Overview
The Smart Cube

The Smart Cube
HYLO, London, undefined, EC1Y 8LZ, GB
Last Update: 16/12/2025
We provide high performing intelligence that answers critical business questions for leading companies around the world. We help you figure out how to implement these answers, faster, through custom research, advanced analytics and best of breed technology. We transform...

Acosta Group
6600 Corporate Center Pkwy, Jacksonville, 32216, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Acosta Group fuses storied expertise, unmatched connectivity and advanced insight to accelerate brand growth – everywhere you sell. Our collective of the most trusted retail, marketing and foodservice agencies is reimagining how people connect with brands at every point...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

The Smart Cube







Acosta Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The Smart Cube in 2026.
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Acosta Group in 2026.
Incident History - The Smart Cube (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The Smart Cube cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Acosta Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Acosta Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

The Smart Cube

Acosta Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.