Comparison Overview

The Right to Research Coalition

VS

Foundation for Government Accountability

The Right to Research Coalition

21 Dupont Circle NW Suite 800, Washington, 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Founded by students in the summer of 2009, the Right to Research Coalition is an international alliance of 31 undergraduate and graduate student organizations, representing nearly 7 million students, that promotes a more open scholarly publishing system. The Right to Research Coalition believes that no student should be denied access to the scholarly articles they need, because they or their institution cannot afford access. The coalition works to educate the next generation of scholars and researchers about Open Access and to advocate for policies at the campus, national, and international levels that expand access to the results of research.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Foundation for Government Accountability

Suite 201-279, Naples, FL, 34119, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

The Foundation for Government Accountability promotes better lives for individuals and families by equipping policymakers with principled strategies to replace failed health and welfare programs nationwide. Our core principles include transparency, private enterprise, individual liberty and limited, constitutional government. As an organization, we demand integrity, honesty, perseverance and personal accountability. Governed by an independent Board of Directors, the Foundation for Government Accountability is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501c(3) tax-exempt organization. Charitable donations are tax-deductible to the full extent of the law. FGA’s support comes almost entirely from individuals who agree with our mission and are committed to the principles of freedom and the free market. The remainder is from private foundations and businesses who share our desire for good ideas that protect patients and taxpayers. We do not seek or accept government funding, and we do not perform contract work for any entity.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-right-to-research-coalition.jpeg
The Right to Research Coalition
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundation-for-government-accountability.jpeg
Foundation for Government Accountability
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Right to Research Coalition
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Foundation for Government Accountability
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Right to Research Coalition in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foundation for Government Accountability in 2025.

Incident History — The Right to Research Coalition (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Right to Research Coalition cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Foundation for Government Accountability (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foundation for Government Accountability cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-right-to-research-coalition.jpeg
The Right to Research Coalition
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundation-for-government-accountability.jpeg
Foundation for Government Accountability
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Right to Research Coalition company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Foundation for Government Accountability company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Foundation for Government Accountability company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Right to Research Coalition company.

In the current year, Foundation for Government Accountability company and The Right to Research Coalition company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Foundation for Government Accountability company nor The Right to Research Coalition company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Foundation for Government Accountability company nor The Right to Research Coalition company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Foundation for Government Accountability company nor The Right to Research Coalition company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Right to Research Coalition company nor Foundation for Government Accountability company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Right to Research Coalition nor Foundation for Government Accountability holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Foundation for Government Accountability company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Right to Research Coalition company.

Neither The Right to Research Coalition nor Foundation for Government Accountability holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Right to Research Coalition nor Foundation for Government Accountability holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Right to Research Coalition nor Foundation for Government Accountability holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Right to Research Coalition nor Foundation for Government Accountability holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Right to Research Coalition nor Foundation for Government Accountability holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Right to Research Coalition nor Foundation for Government Accountability holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H