FGA
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
foundation-for-government-accountability
Website:
Employees number:
42
Number of followers:
2,005
NAICS:
921
Industry Type:
Homepage:
thefga.org
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
FOU_3244671
Scan Status:
In-progress
Foundation for Government Accountability Company CyberSecurity Posture
thefga.org
The Foundation for Government Accountability promotes better lives for individuals and families by equipping policymakers with principled strategies to replace failed health and welfare programs nationwide. Our core principles include transparency, private enterprise, individual liberty and limited, constitutional government. As an organization, we demand integrity, honesty, perseverance and personal accountability. Governed by an independent Board of Directors, the Foundation for Government Accountability is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501c(3) tax-exempt organization. Charitable donations are tax-deductible to the full extent of the law. FGA’s support comes almost entirely from individuals who agree with our mission and are committed to the principles of freedom and the free market. The remainder is from private foundations and businesses who share our desire for good ideas that protect patients and taxpayers. We do not seek or accept government funding, and we do not perform contract work for any entity.
Foundation for Government Accountability A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
FGA Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 700 and 749
FGA
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
FGA Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
FGA
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
FGA Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
0
Attack Types
0
No data available
FGA Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for FGA
Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Foundation for Government Accountability in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Foundation for Government Accountability in 2025.
Incident Types FGA vs Public Policy Offices Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Foundation for Government Accountability in 2025.
Incident History — FGA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
FGA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
FGA Company Subsidiaries
The Foundation for Government Accountability promotes better lives for individuals and families by equipping policymakers with principled strategies to replace failed health and welfare programs nationwide. Our core principles include transparency, private enterprise, individual liberty and limited, constitutional government. As an organization, we demand integrity, honesty, perseverance and personal accountability. Governed by an independent Board of Directors, the Foundation for Government Accountability is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, 501c(3) tax-exempt organization. Charitable donations are tax-deductible to the full extent of the law. FGA’s support comes almost entirely from individuals who agree with our mission and are committed to the principles of freedom and the free market. The remainder is from private foundations and businesses who share our desire for good ideas that protect patients and taxpayers. We do not seek or accept government funding, and we do not perform contract work for any entity.
Loading...
FGA Similar Companies
Partido Revolucionario Institucional
Partido político de México que promueve la participación de la sociedad en la democracia. Con un total de 164 diputados electos y 49 plurinominales,3 el PRI ganó la mayoría en la Cámara de Diputados y se colocó como la primera fuerza política en el Senado, con 41 senadores electos y 11 plurinom
.png)
FGA CyberSecurity News
May 02, 2025 03:09 PM
California’s Homeless Crisis Shows the Need for Government Accountability
California's homelessness crisis isn't just a state failure—it's a case study of reckless government spending...
October 01, 2024 09:15 AM
Federal Contracting
The federal government spends hundreds of billions of dollars each year on contracts, which consume a large portion of the federal budget.
July 30, 2024 07:00 AM
CrowdStrike Chaos Highlights Key Cyber Vulnerabilities with Software Updates
a software update from the cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike caused Microsoft Windows operating systems to crash—resulting in potentially the...
June 13, 2024 07:00 AM
What are the Biggest Challenges to Federal Cybersecurity? (High Risk Update)
Our new report provides an update on the federal government's progress with addressing cybersecurity challenges and our recommendations to tackle them.
March 01, 2024 08:00 AM
Jennifer Franks | Top Cybersecurity Leaders 2024
U.S. Government Accountability Office Director of Information Technology & Cybersecurity Jennifer Franks discusses her career and the...
August 23, 2023 07:00 AM
Big Tech Has Penetrated the GAO
How the industry is positioned to shape the debate over U.S. industrial policy, and generally lobby for its interests, from within the...
August 22, 2022 07:00 AM
COVID and Federalism: Rich Opportunities for Public Accountability
The COVID-19 crisis offered excellent lessons in the advantages of federalism, the division of power between the federal government and the states.
December 08, 2021 08:00 AM
Defense Contractor Cybersecurity:
The Department of Defense is working on a framework to certify that contractors have proper cybersecurity practices in place to protect data.
October 20, 2021 04:27 PM
Cyber Warfare and U.S. Cyber Command
Cyber Warfare and U.S. Cyber Command James Di Pane The world of cyber operations is notoriously secretive. Nevertheless, even a rudimentary understanding of...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
FGA CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Foundation for Government Accountability
The official website of Foundation for Government Accountability is http://www.thefga.org.
Foundation for Government Accountability’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Foundation for Government Accountability’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 743, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
How many security badges does Foundation for Government Accountability’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Foundation for Government Accountability currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Foundation for Government Accountability have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Foundation for Government Accountability is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Foundation for Government Accountability have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Foundation for Government Accountability does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Foundation for Government Accountability comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Foundation for Government Accountability is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Foundation for Government Accountability have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Foundation for Government Accountability does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Foundation for Government Accountability comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Foundation for Government Accountability is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Foundation for Government Accountability have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Foundation for Government Accountability is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Foundation for Government Accountability
Foundation for Government Accountability operates primarily in the Public Policy Offices industry.
Number of Employees at Foundation for Government Accountability
Foundation for Government Accountability employs approximately 42 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Foundation for Government Accountability
Foundation for Government Accountability presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Foundation for Government Accountability’s LinkedIn Followers
Foundation for Government Accountability’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 2,005 followers.
NAICS Classification of Foundation for Government Accountability
Foundation for Government Accountability is classified under the NAICS code 921, which corresponds to Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support.
Foundation for Government Accountability’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Foundation for Government Accountability does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Foundation for Government Accountability’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Foundation for Government Accountability maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/foundation-for-government-accountability.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Foundation for Government Accountability
As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Foundation for Government Accountability has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Foundation for Government Accountability has an estimated 1,025 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
Foundation for Government Accountability CyberSecurity History Information
How many cyber incidents has Foundation for Government Accountability faced ?
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Foundation for Government Accountability has faced 0 incidents in the past.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Foundation for Government Accountability ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include .
Incident Details
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Additional Questions
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=foundation-for-government-accountability' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
