Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Phia Group, LLCThe Phia Group, LLC
VS
PortoPorto
The Phia Group, LLC

The Phia Group, LLC

Canton, 02021, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.phiagroup.com
634/1000Poor

The Phia Group, LLC, headquartered in Canton, Massachusetts, is an experienced provider of health care cost containment techniques offering comprehensive consulting services, plan document drafting, subrogation and overpayment recovery, claim negotiation, plan defense, ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:221
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Porto

Porto

Avenida Rio Branco, 1489, Sao Paulo, SP, BR, 01205-001

Last Update: 19/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://porto.vc/linkedin
656/1000Weak

A Porto é mais que uma seguradora, é um ecossistema de soluções de serviços de proteção com tecnologia embarcada, para melhorar e facilitar a experiência do cliente. Com mais de 70 anos de mercado, a atuação da companhia se concentra hoje em quatro pilares estratégicos ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:24,566
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Phia Group, LLC

The Phia Group, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Porto

Porto

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Phia Group, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Porto in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Phia Group, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Phia Group, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Porto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Porto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Phia Group, LLC

The Phia Group, LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE0903409101725
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE1770199665
Porto

Porto

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
POR3692036090725
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
POR4102041102125

FAQ

Between The Phia Group, LLC company and Porto company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and Porto company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and Porto company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and Porto company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and Porto company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and Porto company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and Porto company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and Porto company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and Porto company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and Porto company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and Porto company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC and Porto, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC and Porto, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Phia Group, LLC or Porto ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Phia Group, LLC or Porto ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC and Porto, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC and Porto, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3