Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Phia Group, LLCThe Phia Group, LLC
VS
MetLifeMetLife
The Phia Group, LLC

The Phia Group, LLC

Canton, 02021, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.phiagroup.com
634/1000Poor

The Phia Group, LLC, headquartered in Canton, Massachusetts, is an experienced provider of health care cost containment techniques offering comprehensive consulting services, plan document drafting, subrogation and overpayment recovery, claim negotiation, plan defense, ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:221
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
MetLife

MetLife

200 Park Ave, New York, NY, US, 10166

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.metlife.com
666/1000Weak

We live in a time of unprecedented change. A time when economies, regulations, and social safety nets are all in flux. Customers around the globe have told us they’re overwhelmed by the pace of change and are looking for a trusted partner to help them manage life’s twi...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:43,494
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Phia Group, LLC

The Phia Group, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MetLife

MetLife

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Phia Group, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MetLife in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Phia Group, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Phia Group, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MetLife (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MetLife cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Phia Group, LLC

The Phia Group, LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE0903409101725
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE1770199665
MetLife

MetLife

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MET851032025
🔒 Incident : Breach
MET502072525
🔒 Incident : Breach
MET636072625

FAQ

Between The Phia Group, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and MetLife company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and MetLife company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC company and MetLife company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC and MetLife, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC and MetLife, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Phia Group, LLC or MetLife ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Phia Group, LLC or MetLife ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC and MetLife, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Phia Group, LLC and MetLife, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA