Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Pension Specialists, Ltd.The Pension Specialists, Ltd.
VS
RSM US LLPRSM US LLP
The Pension Specialists, Ltd.

The Pension Specialists, Ltd.

10501 North 2nd Street, Machesney Park, 61115, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
632/1000Poor

The Pension Specialists, Ltd. is an independent retirement plan third party administrator. Our goal is to provide clients a highly satisfying initial service experience and to provide an ever-improving service experience into the future. Formed in 1987, we have grown...

NAICS:5412
NAICS Definition:Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees:22
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
RSM US LLP

RSM US LLP

30 S Wacker Dr, Chicago, 60606, US

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://rsmus.com/
785/1000Fair

Stay Alert: Avoid Recruitment Scams Across industries, cybercriminals are posing as company recruiters using fake job postings and employment offers to trick people into providing personal information or payment. Be alert and never provide personal/financial informati...

NAICS:5412
NAICS Definition:Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees:19,460
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Pension Specialists, Ltd.

The Pension Specialists, Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
RSM US LLP

RSM US LLP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Pension Specialists, Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RSM US LLP in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Pension Specialists, Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Pension Specialists, Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - RSM US LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RSM US LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Pension Specialists, Ltd.

The Pension Specialists, Ltd.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE244080425
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE638072525
RSM US LLP

RSM US LLP

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between The Pension Specialists, Ltd. company and RSM US LLP company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Pension Specialists, Ltd. company and RSM US LLP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Pension Specialists, Ltd. company and RSM US LLP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Pension Specialists, Ltd. company and RSM US LLP company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Pension Specialists, Ltd. company and RSM US LLP company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Pension Specialists, Ltd. company and RSM US LLP company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Pension Specialists, Ltd. company and RSM US LLP company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Pension Specialists, Ltd. company and RSM US LLP company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Pension Specialists, Ltd. company and RSM US LLP company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Pension Specialists, Ltd. company and RSM US LLP company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Pension Specialists, Ltd. company and RSM US LLP company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Pension Specialists, Ltd. and RSM US LLP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Pension Specialists, Ltd. and RSM US LLP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Pension Specialists, Ltd. or RSM US LLP ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Pension Specialists, Ltd. or RSM US LLP ?
Between The Pension Specialists, Ltd. and RSM US LLP, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Pension Specialists, Ltd. and RSM US LLP, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2