Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Next GroupThe Next Group
VS
KellyKelly
The Next Group

The Next Group

L3, 107 Pitt Street, Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 23/11/2025

View Profile
759/1000Fair

The Next Group is the parent company for two of Australia's leading recruitment and search firms - The Next Step and The Safe Step. We make great things happen in the world of work by helping organisations build successful teams, and connecting quality talent with new o...

NAICS:5613
NAICS Definition:Employment Services
Employees:138
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Kelly

Kelly

999 W Big Beaver Rd, Troy, Michigan, US, 48084

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kellyservices.us
757/1000Fair

We’ve been helping organizations find the people they need longer than any other company in the world. Since inventing the staffing industry in 1946, we have become experts in the many industries and markets we serve. With a network of suppliers and partners around the ...

NAICS:5613
NAICS Definition:Employment Services
Employees:19,853
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Next Group

The Next Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kelly

Kelly

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Next Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kelly in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Next Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Next Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kelly (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kelly cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Next Group

The Next Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Kelly

Kelly

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between The Next Group company and Kelly company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Next Group company and Kelly company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Next Group company and Kelly company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Next Group company and Kelly company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Next Group company and Kelly company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Next Group company and Kelly company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Next Group company and Kelly company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Next Group company and Kelly company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Next Group company and Kelly company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Next Group company and Kelly company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Next Group company and Kelly company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Next Group and Kelly, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Next Group and Kelly, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Next Group or Kelly ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Next Group or Kelly ?
Between The Next Group and Kelly, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Next Group and Kelly, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8