Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Medford Radiology Group, P.C.Medford Radiology Group, P.C.
VS
Hapvida NotreDame IntermédicaHapvida NotreDame Intermédica
Medford Radiology Group, P.C.

Medford Radiology Group, P.C.

842 E. Main St, Medford, 97504, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
748/1000Moderate

MRG is a radiology physician practice located in Medford, OR. MRG has twenty four physicians that provide diagnostic and interventional radiology services to referring physician and health care providers, hospitals, clinics and and imaging centers in the southern Orego...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:30
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Av. Paulista 867, São Paulo, 01311-100, BR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
763/1000Fair

Com cerca de 80 anos de experiência, a Hapvida é hoje a maior empresa de saúde integrada da América Latina. A companhia, que possui mais de 69 mil colaboradores, atende quase 16 milhões de beneficiários de saúde e odontologia espalhados pelas cinco regiões do Brasil. T...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:36,300
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Medford Radiology Group, P.C.

Medford Radiology Group, P.C.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Medford Radiology Group, P.C. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Medford Radiology Group, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Medford Radiology Group, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Medford Radiology Group, P.C.

Medford Radiology Group, P.C.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MED22374623
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Medford Radiology Group, P.C. company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Medford Radiology Group, P.C. company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Medford Radiology Group, P.C. company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Medford Radiology Group, P.C. company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Medford Radiology Group, P.C. company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Medford Radiology Group, P.C. company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Medford Radiology Group, P.C. company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Medford Radiology Group, P.C. company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Medford Radiology Group, P.C. company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Medford Radiology Group, P.C. company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Medford Radiology Group, P.C. company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Medford Radiology Group, P.C. and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Medford Radiology Group, P.C. and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Medford Radiology Group, P.C. or Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Medford Radiology Group, P.C. or Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica ?
Between Medford Radiology Group, P.C. and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Medford Radiology Group, P.C. and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2