Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mansour GroupMansour Group
VS
BlackRockBlackRock
Mansour Group

Mansour Group

Cairo, EG

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
762/1000Fair

The Mansour Group is a family-owned conglomerate with over 60,000 employees, a presence in more than 100 countries and total revenues exceeding $7.5 billion. Founded in 1952, we manage successful businesses across a number of sectors and have long-term partnerships with...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:1,651
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BlackRock

BlackRock

50 Hudson Yards, New York, NY, US, 10001

Last Update: 12/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.blackrock.com
825/1000Good

BlackRock is a global asset manager and technology provider dedicated to helping more and more people experience financial well-being. We help millions of people invest to build savings that serve them throughout their lives. We always start with our clients’ needs a...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:32,259
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mansour Group

Mansour Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BlackRock

BlackRock

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mansour Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BlackRock in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mansour Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mansour Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BlackRock (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BlackRock cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mansour Group

Mansour Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BlackRock

BlackRock

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BLA01216223

FAQ

Between Mansour Group company and BlackRock company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mansour Group company and BlackRock company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mansour Group company and BlackRock company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mansour Group company and BlackRock company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mansour Group company and BlackRock company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mansour Group company and BlackRock company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mansour Group company and BlackRock company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mansour Group company and BlackRock company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mansour Group company and BlackRock company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mansour Group company and BlackRock company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mansour Group company and BlackRock company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mansour Group and BlackRock, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mansour Group and BlackRock, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mansour Group or BlackRock ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mansour Group or BlackRock ?
Between Mansour Group and BlackRock, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mansour Group and BlackRock, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA