Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Libyan International Telecom CompanyThe Libyan International Telecom Company
VS
NokiaNokia
The Libyan International Telecom Company

The Libyan International Telecom Company

LY

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://LITC.ly
809/1000Good

The Libyan International Telecom Company (LITC) is one of the subsidiaries of the Libyan Post and Telecommunications and Information Technology Holding Company. LITC targets to commit to the following: Providing high quality and affordable services to our customers. ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:90
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Nokia

Nokia

Karakaari 7, Espoo, Southern Finland, FI, 02610

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.nokia.com
802/1000Good

Nokia is a global leader in connectivity for the AI era. With expertise across fixed, mobile, and transport networks, powered by the innovation of Nokia Bell Labs, we’re advancing connectivity to secure a brighter world. Advanced connectivity is key to enable the oppor...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:100,250
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Libyan International Telecom Company

The Libyan International Telecom Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nokia

Nokia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

The Libyan International Telecom Company has 47.64% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nokia in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Libyan International Telecom Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Libyan International Telecom Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nokia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nokia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Libyan International Telecom Company

The Libyan International Telecom Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LIBTHE1774312324
Nokia

Nokia

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NOK000031025

FAQ

Between The Libyan International Telecom Company company and Nokia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Libyan International Telecom Company company and Nokia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Libyan International Telecom Company company and Nokia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Libyan International Telecom Company company and Nokia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Libyan International Telecom Company company and Nokia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Libyan International Telecom Company company and Nokia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Libyan International Telecom Company company and Nokia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Libyan International Telecom Company company and Nokia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Libyan International Telecom Company company and Nokia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Libyan International Telecom Company company and Nokia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Libyan International Telecom Company company and Nokia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Libyan International Telecom Company and Nokia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Libyan International Telecom Company and Nokia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Libyan International Telecom Company or Nokia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Libyan International Telecom Company or Nokia ?
Between The Libyan International Telecom Company and Nokia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Libyan International Telecom Company and Nokia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8