Comparison Overview

The Legal Aid Agency

VS

QDROCounsel

The Legal Aid Agency

102 Petty France, London, SW1H 9EA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26

The Legal Aid Agency provides both civil and criminal legal aid and advice in England and Wales. Our work is essential to the fair, effective and efficient operation of the civil and criminal justice systems. We are a delivery organisation which commissions and procures legal aid services from providers (solicitors, barristers and the not-for-profit sector). The Legal Aid Agency is an executive agency of the Ministry of Justice. It came into existence on 1 April 2013 following the abolition of the Legal Services Commission as a result of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Act 2012. The Act created the new statutory office of the Director of Legal Casework. The Director will take decisions on the funding of individual cases. Processes have been put in place to ensure the Legal Aid Agency is able to demonstrate independence of decision-making. There will be an annual report published about these decisions.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 354
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

QDROCounsel

750 S Reservoir St, None, Pomona, California, US, 91766
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

QDROCounsel changes how pension division and valuations are handled in the United States. The highly complex legal and financial issues that arise in pension division are critical in most divorces. In most cases, retirement benefits are the largest assets. And yet more often than not QDROs and Valuations are put on the back burner to be dealt at a later time, many times years after divorce to the detriment of the nonmember spouse. QDROCounsel empowers the family law attorney and financial professional to handle the process of pension division from start to finish.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qdrocounsel.jpeg
QDROCounsel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Legal Aid Agency
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
QDROCounsel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Legal Aid Agency in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for QDROCounsel in 2025.

Incident History — The Legal Aid Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Legal Aid Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — QDROCounsel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

QDROCounsel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-legal-aid-agency.jpeg
The Legal Aid Agency
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qdrocounsel.jpeg
QDROCounsel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Legal Aid Agency company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to QDROCounsel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The Legal Aid Agency company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas QDROCounsel company has not reported any.

In the current year, The Legal Aid Agency company has reported more cyber incidents than QDROCounsel company.

Neither QDROCounsel company nor The Legal Aid Agency company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

The Legal Aid Agency company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other QDROCounsel company has not reported such incidents publicly.

The Legal Aid Agency company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while QDROCounsel company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The Legal Aid Agency company nor QDROCounsel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Legal Aid Agency nor QDROCounsel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Legal Aid Agency company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to QDROCounsel company.

The Legal Aid Agency company employs more people globally than QDROCounsel company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither The Legal Aid Agency nor QDROCounsel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Legal Aid Agency nor QDROCounsel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Legal Aid Agency nor QDROCounsel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Legal Aid Agency nor QDROCounsel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Legal Aid Agency nor QDROCounsel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Legal Aid Agency nor QDROCounsel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X