Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Julia LanguageThe Julia Language
VS
IGTIGT
The Julia Language

The Julia Language

Everywhere on Earth, OO

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://julialang.org
750/1000Fair

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing. Join the conversation at #JuliaLang

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:9
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IGT

IGT

6355 S Buffalo Dr, Las Vegas, NV, US, 89113

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.IGT.com
568/1000Very Poor

IGT is a leading global provider of gaming, digital and financial technology solutions, formed through the combination of International Game Technology PLC’s Gaming & Digital Business and Everi Holdings Inc. IGT’s offering spans gaming machines, game content and systems...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:10,303
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Julia Language

The Julia Language

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IGT

IGT

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Julia Language in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IGT in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Julia Language (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Julia Language cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IGT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IGT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Julia Language

The Julia Language

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IGT

IGT

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
IGT2192021112025
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
IGT2502025112125

FAQ

Between The Julia Language company and IGT company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Julia Language company and IGT company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Julia Language company and IGT company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Julia Language company and IGT company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Julia Language company and IGT company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Julia Language company and IGT company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Julia Language company and IGT company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Julia Language company and IGT company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Julia Language company and IGT company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Julia Language company and IGT company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Julia Language company and IGT company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Julia Language and IGT, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Julia Language and IGT, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Julia Language or IGT ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Julia Language or IGT ?
Between The Julia Language and IGT, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Julia Language and IGT, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-53532
SUMMARY

OpenEXR is the reference implementation and specification for the EXR image format, widely used in the motion picture industry. In versions 3.4.0 through 3.4.12, a crafted HTJ2K-compressed EXR file causes an unconditional process abort in any application that calls exr_start_read() on untrusted input, resulting in denial of service. The crash is triggered by a QCD marker whose lower five bits are zero, which OpenEXR passes into the vendored OpenJPH library while constructing the codestream and evaluating its quantization delta parameters. OpenJPH uses an assertion rather than a recoverable error to validate those bits, so any invalid value calls abort() directly and cannot be intercepted by surrounding error handling, a problem compounded by OpenEXR wrapping only its internal HT header parser in error handling while leaving the later codestream read and construction calls unprotected. This issue has been resolved in version 3.4.13.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-78435
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in Faveo Helpdesk up to 2.0.3. Affected is the function unlink of the file app/Http/Controllers/Admin/helpdesk/SettingsController.php of the component Logo Handler. Such manipulation of the argument data1 leads to path traversal. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.7
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:N/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-78434
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in Faveo Helpdesk up to 2.0.3. This impacts the function FormController::post_ticket_reply of the file app/Http/Controllers/Client/helpdesk/FormController.php of the component post-ticket-reply Endpoint. This manipulation causes missing authentication. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-78284
SUMMARY

Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Deletion in MasterStudy LMS <= 3.7.42 versions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-78282
SUMMARY

Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Stripe Payments <= 2.1.2 versions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8