Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Home DepotThe Home Depot
VS
Groupement MousquetairesGroupement Mousquetaires
The Home Depot

The Home Depot

2455 Paces Ferry Road, Atlanta, 30339, US

Last Update: 19/07/2026

View Profile
805/1000Good

The Home Depot, the world’s largest home improvement specialty retailer, values and rewards dedicated, knowledgeable, and experienced professionals. We operate more than 2,300 retail stores in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Island...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:129,302
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2
Groupement Mousquetaires

Groupement Mousquetaires

1 allée des Mousquetaires, Bondoufle, 91078, FR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
803/1000Good

Avec près de 4000 points de vente en Europe et un chiffre d'affaires de 53,39 milliards d'euros en 2022, Le Groupement Les Mousquetaires est un acteur majeur de la grande distribution. Créé en France en 1969, le Groupement, fondé sur l'initiative privée, rassemble auj...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:61,493
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Home Depot

The Home Depot

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Groupement Mousquetaires

Groupement Mousquetaires

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Home Depot in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Groupement Mousquetaires in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Home Depot (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Home Depot cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Groupement Mousquetaires (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Groupement Mousquetaires cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Home Depot

The Home Depot

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE1765591280
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
THE5692256100625
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE500050824
Groupement Mousquetaires

Groupement Mousquetaires

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between The Home Depot company and Groupement Mousquetaires company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Home Depot company and Groupement Mousquetaires company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Home Depot company and Groupement Mousquetaires company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Home Depot company and Groupement Mousquetaires company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Home Depot company and Groupement Mousquetaires company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Home Depot company and Groupement Mousquetaires company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Home Depot company and Groupement Mousquetaires company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Home Depot company and Groupement Mousquetaires company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Home Depot company and Groupement Mousquetaires company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Home Depot company and Groupement Mousquetaires company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Home Depot company and Groupement Mousquetaires company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Home Depot and Groupement Mousquetaires, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Home Depot and Groupement Mousquetaires, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Home Depot or Groupement Mousquetaires ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Home Depot or Groupement Mousquetaires ?
Between The Home Depot and Groupement Mousquetaires, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Home Depot and Groupement Mousquetaires, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1