Comparison Overview

The Heckscher Museum of Art

VS

Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center

The Heckscher Museum of Art

2 Prime Ave, Huntington, New York, 11743, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

At The Heckscher Museum of Art, we believe that experiencing art broadens our understanding of the past, fosters community connections to our present, and creates diverse possibilities for our future. The Heckscher Museum maintains a Collection that includes more than 2,300 works from the sixteenth to the twenty-first century, including European and American painting, sculpture, works on paper, and photography. The Museum was founded in 1920 by Anna and August Heckscher, who donated the Museum building and 185 works of art to the Town of Huntington. Mr. and Mrs. Heckscher envisioned Heckscher Park and the Museum as the center of the community’s cultural, recreational, and social life. Inspired by that vision, the Museum has championed the value of publicly accessible art and arts education for everyone.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center

National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 650 and 699

The Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center (SEEC) is a non-profit entity that serves as a model lab school with a museum-based curriculum. Children aged infant through kindergarten and their families receive all-day, part-time and community workshop instruction in on-site classrooms and the Smithsonian Institution museums. In addition to providing on site early care and education, SEEC offers workshops for museum educators, classroom teachers, families, parents, nannies and other caregivers in order to aid them in promoting curiosity and build critical thinking skills in young children. As an organization, SEEC is a leader in the field of museum-based education, influencing museums and schools throughout the country. Our educators apply the best practices recognized in the early childhood field and enrich the children’s learning with an object-based approach. Through these objects and the stories associated with them, SEEC teachers work towards creating a deep and rich curriculum that takes advantage of all the wonderful resources the Smithsonian has to offer. SEEC’s three pillars of curiosity, community, and wonder sets us apart from other organizations and enable us to be a unique source of development for students, staff, and educators alike.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-heckscher-museum-of-art.jpeg
The Heckscher Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smithsonian-early-enrichment-center.jpeg
Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Heckscher Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Heckscher Museum of Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center in 2026.

Incident History — The Heckscher Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Heckscher Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-heckscher-museum-of-art.jpeg
The Heckscher Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smithsonian-early-enrichment-center.jpeg
Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

The Heckscher Museum of Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The Heckscher Museum of Art company has not reported any.

In the current year, Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center company and The Heckscher Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while The Heckscher Museum of Art company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center company nor The Heckscher Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center company nor The Heckscher Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Heckscher Museum of Art company nor Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Heckscher Museum of Art nor Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Heckscher Museum of Art company nor Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Heckscher Museum of Art company employs more people globally than Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Heckscher Museum of Art nor Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Heckscher Museum of Art nor Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Heckscher Museum of Art nor Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Heckscher Museum of Art nor Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Heckscher Museum of Art nor Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Heckscher Museum of Art nor Smithsonian Early Enrichment Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N